[2012] KEHC 3151 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 3151 (KLR)

The court found that the interests of justice required the preservation of the status quo pending the hearing of the application inter partes. Given that the applicants had filed an application for stay promptly and that the implementation of the orders would affect the distribution of the estate, the court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] KEHC 3151 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Edwin Gitau Kinyuru; Applicant: Francis Karugi Kinyuru; Applicant: Raymond Mbugua Kinyuru; Applicant: Pauline Wanjiku Kinyuru; Respondent: Samuel Wairire Kinyuru; Respondent: Beatrice Wamuhu Kinyuru; Respondent: Miriam Waithera; Respondent: Andrew Njenga; Respondent: Benson Kinyuru Muongi; Respondent: Pauline Nendaya Waithera
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 25 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Interlocutory Application for Stay Pending Appeal
Outcome
Interim stay granted pending inter partes hearing.
Judges
D Schofield
Legal Topics
Distribution of Estate, Beneficiary Entitlement, Stay of Execution, Interlocutory Orders
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Distribution of Estate Beneficiary Entitlement Stay of Execution Interlocutory Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Edwin Gitau Kinyuru

Applicant

Francis Karugi Kinyuru

Applicant

Raymond Mbugua Kinyuru

Applicant

Pauline Wanjiku Kinyuru

Applicant

Samuel Wairire Kinyuru

Respondent

Beatrice Wamuhu Kinyuru

Respondent

Miriam Waithera

Respondent

Andrew Njenga

Respondent

Benson Kinyuru Muongi

Respondent

Pauline Nendaya Waithera

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Interlocutory Application for Stay Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether a stay of execution of the orders issued on 27th January 2012 should be granted pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to injunctive relief restraining interference with the estate property.
  3. 3 Whether the application should be heard inter partes before substantive orders are made.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the interests of justice required the preservation of the status quo pending the hearing of the application inter partes. Given that the applicants had filed an application for stay promptly and that the implementation of the orders would affect the distribution of the estate, the court exercised its discretion to grant a temporary stay restraining the District Surveyor from proceeding with the implementation of the orders of 27th January 2012. The court directed that the application be served on all respondents and set a date for inter partes hearing, emphasizing that substantive orders would only be made after hearing all parties.

Court Disposition

Interim stay granted pending inter partes hearing.

Orders

  • The application to be served on all six named respondents and listed for inter partes hearing.
  • Interim stay restraining the District Surveyor Kiambu from implementing the court order of 27th January 2012 until the application is heard on 6th March 2012.