[2021] KECPT 282 (KLR)

[2021] KECPT 282 (KLR)

The tribunal found that since the value of the subject matter could not be ascertained from the proceedings, it had discretion under the Advocates (Remuneration) Amendment Order 2014 to determine reasonable instruction fees and other costs. The tribunal awarded Ksh.70,150 as instruction fees after considering all...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KECPT 282 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Dr. Edwin Kipng'eno Rono; Respondent: Kenyatta Matibabu Sacco Ltd; Respondent: Andrew K. Rotich
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 352 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Bill of Costs Application / Taxation of Costs Following Judgment
Outcome
Applicant's bill of costs partially allowed and taxed; total costs awarded to applicant.
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Assessment of Instruction Fees, Advocates Remuneration Order, Costs Award Criteria
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Assessment of Instruction Fees Advocates Remuneration Order Costs Award Criteria

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr. Edwin Kipng'eno Rono

Applicant

Kenyatta Matibabu Sacco Ltd

Respondent

Andrew K. Rotich

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Bill of Costs Application / Taxation of Costs Following Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's bill of costs should be allowed and to what extent.
  2. 2 How instruction fees and other claimed costs should be assessed where the value of the subject matter is unascertainable.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to costs for service of documents without receipts.

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that since the value of the subject matter could not be ascertained from the proceedings, it had discretion under the Advocates (Remuneration) Amendment Order 2014 to determine reasonable instruction fees and other costs. The tribunal awarded Ksh.70,150 as instruction fees after considering all relevant factors. Claims for items covered under instruction fees were declined to prevent double recovery. Claims for service of documents were disallowed due to lack of receipts and absence of specific provision under the Remuneration Order. Attendance and hearing-related items were assessed at prescribed rates based on the nature of attendance. Receipted disbursements were...

Court Disposition

Applicant's bill of costs partially allowed and taxed; total costs awarded to applicant.

Orders

  • The applicant is awarded a total of Ksh.106,730 as taxed costs.
  • Claims for items covered under instruction fees are declined.