[2018] KEELRC 258 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 258 (KLR)

The court found that the claim was filed more than 52 years after the alleged underpayments began and over 22 years after the pension underpayment claim arose. Under section 4(1) of the Limitation of Actions Act, any contractual claim must be brought within six years. The claimant did not seek leave to file out of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 258 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Edwin Mubinya Murema; Respondent: The Hon. Attorney General on behalf of the Republic of Kenya; Respondent: Inspector General National Police Services; Respondent: The Director of Pensions, Kenya
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 78 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
suit dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Judges
MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Limitation of Actions, Pension Entitlements, Public Service Employment, Jurisdiction, Contractual Claims
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Limitation of Actions Pension Entitlements Public Service Employment Jurisdiction Contractual Claims

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Edwin Mubinya Murema

Claimant

The Hon. Attorney General on behalf of the Republic of Kenya

Respondent

Inspector General National Police Services

Respondent

The Director of Pensions, Kenya

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claim for underpayment of salary and pension is statute-barred under the Limitation of Actions Act.
  2. 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to entertain a claim filed outside the statutory limitation period without leave.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to payment for the period worked in Uganda and correct calculation of pension dues.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claim was filed more than 52 years after the alleged underpayments began and over 22 years after the pension underpayment claim arose. Under section 4(1) of the Limitation of Actions Act, any contractual claim must be brought within six years. The claimant did not seek leave to file out of time, nor did he provide any reason for the delay. The court, following binding precedent, held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit, as no extension of time is permissible for contractual claims after the statutory period lapses. Consequently, the suit was struck out at the outset for want of jurisdiction, and no determination on the merits was made.

Court Disposition

suit dismissed for want of jurisdiction

Orders

  • The suit is struck out for want of jurisdiction.
  • No order as to costs.