[2018] KEHC 10096 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 10096 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was not present when the judgment was delivered and was not notified of the judgment date, which satisfactorily explained the delay in filing the appeal. The court exercised its discretion under Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act and relevant rules to allow the application for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 10096 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Edwin Muchugia; Respondent: May Ayallo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Miscellaneous Application 159 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application allowed with conditions
Judges
BT Jaden
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals From Subordinate Courts, Judicial Discretion, Delay and Explanation
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals From Subordinate Courts Judicial Discretion Delay and Explanation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Edwin Muchugia

Applicant

May Ayallo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated good and sufficient cause for failing to file the appeal within the prescribed time.
  2. 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to grant leave to file the appeal out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was not present when the judgment was delivered and was not notified of the judgment date, which satisfactorily explained the delay in filing the appeal. The court exercised its discretion under Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act and relevant rules to allow the application for extension of time, subject to the condition that the decretal sum be deposited in an interest-earning account or in court within 30 days, and that the appeal be filed within 7 days thereafter. Costs were awarded to the respondent.

Court Disposition

application allowed with conditions

Orders

  • Leave granted to file memorandum of appeal out of time.
  • Decretal sum to be deposited in an interest-earning bank account of counsels for the parties or in court within 30 days.