[2020] KETLABT 135 (KLR)

[2020] KETLABT 135 (KLR)

The Transport Licensing Appeals Board determined that the issues raised in the appeal, specifically the challenge to the gazettement and implementation of KS 2295:2018 speed limiters and the alleged lack of public participation, are also the subject of consolidated petitions pending before the High Court at Chuka....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KETLABT 135 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Edwin Mukabana & Michael Kariuki; Respondent: The National Transport & Safety Authority; Interested Party: Speed Governors & Safety Authority
Court
Transport Licensing Appeals Board Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Appeal 039 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Stay Application
Outcome
appeal stayed
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Tribunals, Public Participation Requirements, Statutory Instruments Challenge, Stay of Proceedings
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Jurisdiction of Tribunals Public Participation Requirements Statutory Instruments Challenge Stay of Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Edwin Mukabana & Michael Kariuki

Appellant

The National Transport & Safety Authority

Respondent

Speed Governors & Safety Authority

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Stay Application

  1. 1 Whether the Transport Licensing Appeals Board has jurisdiction to hear the appeal challenging the implementation of KS 2295:2018 speed limiters.
  2. 2 Whether the appeal should be stayed pending the hearing and determination of consolidated petitions in the High Court at Chuka.

Ratio Decidendi

The Transport Licensing Appeals Board determined that the issues raised in the appeal, specifically the challenge to the gazettement and implementation of KS 2295:2018 speed limiters and the alleged lack of public participation, are also the subject of consolidated petitions pending before the High Court at Chuka. The Board recognized that the High Court has supervisory jurisdiction over tribunals and exclusive original jurisdiction to determine constitutional questions, including the validity of statutory instruments and the adequacy of public participation. To avoid conflicting decisions and in deference to the judicial hierarchy, the Board held that it is appropriate to stay the appeal...

Court Disposition

appeal stayed

Orders

  • This appeal is stayed pending the hearing and determination of consolidated petitions no. 9 & 10 in the High Court at Chuka.