[2010] KEHC 3335 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's appeal had overwhelming chances of success based on the grounds that the prosecution's evidence did not establish the offences of house breaking and theft, and that the evidence relied upon was contradictory. The court was satisfied that these grounds went beyond merely arguable...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 3335 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Edwin Ndegwa Justus; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 60 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for bail pending appeal allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, House Breaking, Theft, Conviction Appeal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edwin Ndegwa Justus
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to bail pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the appeal has overwhelming chances of success.
- 3 Whether there exist exceptional or unusual circumstances justifying bail pending appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's appeal had overwhelming chances of success based on the grounds that the prosecution's evidence did not establish the offences of house breaking and theft, and that the evidence relied upon was contradictory. The court was satisfied that these grounds went beyond merely arguable points and justified the grant of bail pending appeal. Consequently, the applicant was admitted to bail pending appeal on the terms specified.
Court Disposition
Application for bail pending appeal allowed.
Orders
- The applicant is admitted to bail pending appeal.
- The applicant shall be released upon signing a bond of Ksh.50,000 before the Deputy Registrar with one surety of like sum.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI
Criminal Appeal 60 of 2010
EDWIN NDEGWA JUSTUS……..…………………..….APPLICANTAPPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC…………………………………………………………….RESPONDENT
(Appeal from the original conviction in the Chief Magistrate’s Court
at Nyeri in Criminal Case No.651 of 2008
dated 10th March 2010
by Joshua Kiarie, Senior Principal Magistrate)
RULING
EDWIN NDEGWA JUSTUS hereinafter referred to as the applicant, was tried on a charge of house breaking contrary toSection 304 (1)and stealing contrary toSection 279 (b)of the Penal Code. After undergoing a trial, the Applicant was convicted and sentenced to a fine of Ksh.60,000/= in default 12 months imprisonment on each limb of the charge. The Applicant was dissatisfied hence this appeal.
The Applicant has now taken out the motion dated 24th March 2010 pursuant to the provisions ofSection 357 (1)of the Criminal Procedure Code in which he seeks to be admitted to bail pending appeal. The motion is the subject matter of this ruling. It is the submission of Mr. Wahome, learned advocate for the Appellant, that the appeal has high chances of success. It is also argued that the Appellant is due to join college in the month of May 2010 hence unless he is released on bond pending appeal he is likely to lose that chance. Mr. Orinda, learned Provincial State Counsel, was of the same view as that of Mr. Wahome.
When dealing with an application for bail pending appeal, the principles are well settled. First, an applicant must show that the appeal has overwhelming chances of success. Secondly, an applicant must show the existence of exceptional or unusual circumstances upon which the court can rely to find that it is in the interest of justice to grant bail.
It would appear from the aforesaid principles that the Court must be convinced that the appeal has to have overwhelming chances of success and not just merely raising arguable points. I have examined the grounds of appeal set out on the Petition of Appeal. Two main grounds turn out: First, is that the evidence tendered by the prosecution did not establish the offences of house breaking and theft. Secondly, that the evidence relied upon to convict the Appellant were contradictory. After a careful examination of the aforesaid grounds vis-à-vis the recorded evidence, I am convinced that the appeal has overwhelming chances of success. I therefore see no reason why the Applicant should be deprived of his liberty pending appeal. I hereby admit the Appellant to bail pending appeal. The Appellant/Applicant should be released upon signing a bond of Ksh.50,000/= before the Deputy Registrar of this court with one surety of like sum.
Dated and delivered at Nyeri this 7th day of April 2010.
J. K. SERGON
JUDGE
In open court in the presence of Miss Ngalyuka for the State and Mr. C. Kariuki holding brief
Wahome for Applicant.