[2017] KEELC 780 (KLR)
The plaintiffs have been in open, continuous, and uninterrupted possession of LR No. Karai/Gikambura/T.191 since 1963, a period far exceeding the statutory 12 years required for adverse possession. The defendant, despite being the registered owner since 1959, has not taken any steps to assert his rights or remove...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 780 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Edwin Njoroge Gachuire; Plaintiff: Mary Wangari Ngurugwe; Defendant: Waweru Wainaina
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 499 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the plaintiffs
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Land Registration, Title Extinguishment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edwin Njoroge Gachuire
Plaintiff
Mary Wangari Ngurugwe
Plaintiff
Waweru Wainaina
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiffs have acquired title to LR No. Karai/Gikambura/T.191 by adverse possession.
- 2 Whether the plaintiffs' occupation of the suit property has been open, continuous, and uninterrupted for at least 12 years.
- 3 Whether the defendant's title to the suit property has been extinguished by operation of law.
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs have been in open, continuous, and uninterrupted possession of LR No. Karai/Gikambura/T.191 since 1963, a period far exceeding the statutory 12 years required for adverse possession. The defendant, despite being the registered owner since 1959, has not taken any steps to assert his rights or remove the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs' possession has been adverse to the defendant's interests, and a caution was lodged in 1983 to protect their claim. The defendant's absence and lack of contestation further support the plaintiffs' case. Consequently, the court finds that the plaintiffs have acquired the suit property by adverse possession, and the defendant's title has been...
Court Disposition
judgment for the plaintiffs
Orders
- The plaintiffs have acquired LR No. Karai/Gikambura/T.191 by adverse possession.
- The Land Registrar Kiambu is ordered to transfer LR No. Karai/Gikambura/T.191 into the names of the plaintiffs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
CIVIL CASE NO. 499 OF 2011
EDWIN NJOROGE GACHUIRE…………………....……………1ST PLAINTIFF
MARY WANGARI NGURUGWE…………….………….………2ND PLAINTIFF
=VERSUS=
WAWERU WAINAINA…………………..…………………………DEFENDANT
JUDGEMENT
INTRODUCTION.
1. The defendant is the registered owner of LR No. Karai/ Gikambura /T.191 (suit property). The plaintiffs filed an originating summons in which they are seeking an order that they have acquired the suit property by way of adverse possession.
2. Attempts to serve the defendant in person proved futile as his whereabouts were not known. The defendant was served through substituted service in the standard newspaper. The defendant did not enter appearance. The hearing proceeded by way of formal proof.
PLAINTIFF’S CASE.
3. The Plaintiffs testified that they have been on the suit property since 1963. The two have been utilizing the suit property jointly. They have put up houses in which they stay with their families. They have been living on the suit property without any interruption since 1963. In 1983, the first plaintiff lodged a caution against the title to the suit property to protect his interest. They therefore seek the court’s orders that title to the suit property which is in the name of the defendant has been extinguished and that they should be registered as joint owners of the suit property in place of the defendant.
ANALYSIS
4. The plaintiff’s evidence is not controverted. The law regarding adverse possession is that the plaintiff seeking to be registered as owner of a property by way of adverse possession has to demonstrate that he has been on the suit property for a period of 12 years prior to filing a suit for adverse possession. That possession must be adverse to the interest of the registered owner. The stay must be open and uninterrupted for 12 years.
5. In the instant case, the plaintiffs produced a green card which shows that the suit property was registered in the name of the defendant on 9th September 1959. On 20th January 1983, the first plaintiff lodged a caution against the title. The whereabouts of the defendant are unknown and he has never made any attempt to remove the plaintiffs from the suit property. The plaintiffs have been on the suit property uninterrupted for more than 12 years.
CONCLUSION
6. The defendant’s interest in the suit property has been extinguished by operation of law. The plaintiffs have proved their case to the required standards. Judgment is entered in favour of the plaintiffs against the defendants in the following terms;-
a) The plaintiffs have acquired LR No. Karai/Gikambura/T.191 by
adverse possession.
b) The Land Registrar Kiambu is hereby ordered to transfer LR No.
Karai/Gikambura/T.191 into the names of the plaintiffs.
c) The Deputy Registrar of the Environment and Land Court do sign
all necessary documents to facilitate the transfer of LR. No.
Karai/Gikambura/T.191 into the names of the plaintiffs.
d) The plaintiffs to bear their own costs.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Nairobi this 8thdayof November, 2017
E.O .OBAGA
JUDGE
In the absence of the Plaintiff’s advocates who were aware of the date and time of delivery of judgement.
Court Assistant: Hilda
E.O .OBAGA
JUDGE