[2018] KEHC 4132 (KLR)
The court found that the evidence presented by the prosecution, particularly the testimonies of the complainant and her husband, was credible and consistent. The relationship between the parties was established, and there was no evidence of collusion to falsely implicate the appellant. The medical evidence...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 4132 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Edwin Wamalwa Kangala; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kitale
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 18 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; appellant ordered released unless otherwise lawfully held
- Judges
- HK Chemitei
- Legal Topics
- Grievous Harm, Criminal Liability, Evidence Assessment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edwin Wamalwa Kangala
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution proved the offence of grievous harm against the appellant beyond reasonable doubt.
- 2 Whether the conviction was based on sufficient and credible evidence.
- 3 Whether the appellant's defence raised reasonable doubt.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the evidence presented by the prosecution, particularly the testimonies of the complainant and her husband, was credible and consistent. The relationship between the parties was established, and there was no evidence of collusion to falsely implicate the appellant. The medical evidence corroborated the complainant's account of the attack, and the weapon used was produced in court. The appellant's defence was found to be unconvincing and did not raise any reasonable doubt as to his guilt. Consequently, the conviction was upheld as the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; appellant ordered released unless otherwise lawfully held
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The appellant is to be set free unless lawfully held for another cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
35 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KITALE
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2017
(Being an appeal arising from conviction and sentence in Kitale
Chief magistrate's courtin Criminal case NO. 4257 of 2016
deliveredby P. Biwott Senior Principal Magistrate on 20/2/2017)
EDWIN WAMALWA KANGALA......................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC........................................................................PROSECUTOR
J U D G M E N T
1. The appellant was charged with the offence of Grevious harm contrary to section 234 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the offence were that on the 9th day of October 2016 at 1. 00 pm in nyasi farm within Trans Nzoia County unlawfully did grevious harm to Noval Nekesa Kisongochi.
2. The appellant was convicted and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment hence this appeal. The summary of the proceedings at the trial court were clear and straight forward.
3. PW1 the complaint testified that the appellant was her brother in law. On the material day at around 1. 00 pm he came to their house, where they had been housing him for a while. He went inside the house and removed his items with the intention to moving away. The complainant was outside the house. Suddenly the appellant drew a knife and began attacking her. She sustained serious bodily injuries. He was rushed to Matunda hospital where she was treated. The matter was reported at Kiminini patrol base. a P3 form was issued and filled.
4. Meanwhile, the complainant's husband who was inside the house during the attack came out when he heard the appellant's cry and managed to give chase and apprehended the appellant with the assistance of the members of the public. They took him to Kiminini patrol base. PW2 the appellant's husband testified that he saw the appellant attack the complainant. He identified the knife used by the appellant.
5. PW3 Kimutai Rotich the clinical officer from Matunda hospital produced the P3 form in respect to PW1. The wound was stitched and he opined that it had been caused by a sharp object.
6. PW4 CPL Bishar Mohammed from Kiminini patrol base rearrested the appellant after being brought by the members of the public and upon interrogating him and recording the evidence from the witnesses preferred charges against him. He also produced the knife used to attack the complainant.
7. When put on his defence the appellant gave unsworn evidence denying the charge. He said that on the material day he had gone to work at Kiminini. That the complainant and her husband were to move out of the house once the same was constructed by their father. He said that he was framed in the case.
8. I have perused the proceedings as well as the parties written submissions.
9. The gist of the appellant's grounds of appeal are generally an attack on the fact that there was no sufficient evidence to have him convicted.
10. On the contrary I find the evidence presented by both PW1 and PW2 watertight. Their relationship was clear, sister and brother in law repectively. He did not deny that they had been staying together in one house. More particularly I did not see any evidence that there was a collusion on the part of PW1 and PW2 to fix the appellant.
11. The knife produced was the same one used to stab the complainant. He was immediately arrested and taken to the police post.
12. His defence was a sham to say the least. Even if they had their family differences the action taken by the appellant was heinous. He intended to harm her sister in law.
13. This appeal is devoid of merit and its hereby dismissed.
14. I notice however that the appellant was in custody all through and that he has served a sufficient period in prison. In the premises I do order that he be set free unless lawfully held.
Delivered, signed and dated at Kitale this 27th day of September, 2018.
_______________
H.K. CHEMITEI
JUDGE
27/09/18
In the presence of:
Mr. Kakoi for the Respondent
Appellant – present
Court Assistant – Kirong
Judgment read in open court