[2015] KEHC 6626 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent deserted the petitioner without lawful cause on 31st May 2009 and has not returned since, satisfying the statutory requirement of desertion for at least three years prior to the petition. The petitioner's evidence of cruelty and desertion was unchallenged and credible. The respondent's cross-petition was unsupported by evidence and was dismissed. The court concluded that the marriage had irretrievably broken down, and there was no possibility of reconciliation. The petitioner had not condoned the respondent's conduct, nor was there collusion. Accordingly, the court ordered dissolution of the marriage, granted the petitioner sole custody of the children,...
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 6626 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: E I I; Respondent: M R O
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2015
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 251 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed; cross-petition dismissed
- Judges
- REA Ougo
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Custody of Children, Desertion, Cruelty, Maintenance, Visitation Rights
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E I I
Petitioner
M R O
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent deserted the petitioner without lawful cause for a period sufficient to warrant dissolution of marriage.
- 2 Whether the respondent treated the petitioner with cruelty as alleged.
- 3 Whether the marriage has irretrievably broken down under the applicable law.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent deserted the petitioner without lawful cause on 31st May 2009 and has not returned since, satisfying the statutory requirement of desertion for at least three years prior to the petition. The petitioner's evidence of cruelty and desertion was unchallenged and credible. The respondent's cross-petition was unsupported by evidence and was dismissed. The court concluded that the marriage had irretrievably broken down, and there was no possibility of reconciliation. The petitioner had not condoned the respondent's conduct, nor was there collusion. Accordingly, the court ordered dissolution of the marriage, granted the petitioner sole custody of the children,...
Court Disposition
petition allowed; cross-petition dismissed
Orders
- The marriage between the petitioner and respondent celebrated on 13th February 2004 is dissolved.
- The petitioner is granted sole custody of the children of the marriage.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment