[2020] KEHC 3328 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 3328 (KLR)

The court found that the application for stay demonstrated sufficient urgency based on the material presented, justifying certification as urgent and granting leave for the matter to be heard during the court recess. The court further directed that the respondents be served immediately and that the substantive...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 3328 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Eld. John Johnson Ochieng & 19 Others; Respondent: Rev. Wellingtone Kuthe Owaga & 5 Others
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 13 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Urgent Application for Stay and Directions for Interpartes Hearing
Outcome
Application certified as urgent; leave granted for hearing during recess; directions for interpartes hearing and service issued.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Urgent Applications, Stay of Proceedings, Interpartes Hearing
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Urgent Applications Stay of Proceedings Interpartes Hearing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eld. John Johnson Ochieng & 19 Others

Applicant

Rev. Wellingtone Kuthe Owaga & 5 Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Urgent Application for Stay and Directions for Interpartes Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the application for stay discloses sufficient urgency to warrant certification and expedited hearing.
  2. 2 Whether leave should be granted for the matter to be heard during court recess.
  3. 3 Whether interim orders should be considered interpartes by the Duty Judge.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for stay demonstrated sufficient urgency based on the material presented, justifying certification as urgent and granting leave for the matter to be heard during the court recess. The court further directed that the respondents be served immediately and that the substantive application be heard interpartes before the Duty Judge, who retains discretion to grant interim orders. The matter was referred back to the Kisumu High Court for conclusion, given the proximity of the event sought to be stayed.

Court Disposition

Application certified as urgent; leave granted for hearing during recess; directions for interpartes hearing and service issued.

Orders

  • Leave granted for the matter to be heard during the court recess.
  • Applicants to serve respondents forthwith.