[2016] KEHC 8562 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 8562 (KLR)

The court found that the defendant, having failed to file a defence and having admitted the debt both by correspondence and conduct, had no defence to the plaintiff's claim. The plaintiff provided documentary proof of the outstanding balance and the defendant's proposal to settle by installments. The court held that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 8562 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Elecage Holdings Limited; Defendant: Comarco Construction Company Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 557 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Summary Judgment Application
Outcome
Judgment entered for the plaintiff for Kshs. 24,100,000/- plus interest and costs.
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Debt Recovery, Default of Defence
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Summary Judgment Debt Recovery Default of Defence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elecage Holdings Limited

Plaintiff

Comarco Construction Company Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Summary Judgment Application

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment for the outstanding debt claimed.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant has raised any triable issue or defence to the plaintiff's claim.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to interest and costs as prayed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant, having failed to file a defence and having admitted the debt both by correspondence and conduct, had no defence to the plaintiff's claim. The plaintiff provided documentary proof of the outstanding balance and the defendant's proposal to settle by installments. The court held that there was no triable issue and that summary judgment was appropriate. Judgment was therefore entered for the plaintiff for the sum of Kshs. 24,100,000/-, with interest at 14% per annum from the date of filing suit, and costs to the plaintiff, with interest on costs at 9% per annum from the date of ascertainment.

Court Disposition

Judgment entered for the plaintiff for Kshs. 24,100,000/- plus interest and costs.

Orders

  • Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of Kshs. 24,100,000/-.
  • Interest at 14% per annum from 28th November 2014 until payment in full.