[2005] KEHC 1402 (KLR)
The court held that once land is registered under the Registered Land Act, the rights of the registered proprietor are absolute and not subject to customary law. The 2nd defendant, as the registered owner of LR NO. GITHUNGURI/GITHIGA/1173, was entitled to subdivide and transfer her land as she wished, including to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] KEHC 1402 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Eli John Njogu Wainaina; Plaintiff: John Kariuki; Plaintiff: Samuel Muchiri; Defendant: Wandia Wainaina; Defendant: Lizzie Njeri Wainaina; Defendant: Naomi Njoki Njihia; Defendant: Emily Mbaire Allan
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 4211 of 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- suit dismissed with costs to the defendants
- Judges
- JL Osiemo
- Legal Topics
- Customary Succession, Registered Land, Trusts in Land, Land Adjudication
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eli John Njogu Wainaina
Plaintiff
John Kariuki
Plaintiff
Samuel Muchiri
Plaintiff
Wandia Wainaina
Defendant
Lizzie Njeri Wainaina
Defendant
Naomi Njoki Njihia
Defendant
Emily Mbaire Allan
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the subdivision and transfer of LR NO. GITHUNGURI/GITHIGA/1173 to the daughters by the 2nd defendant was valid under the law.
- 2 Whether Kikuyu Customary Law could override the rights of a registered proprietor under the Registered Land Act.
- 3 Whether the defendants held the suit properties in trust for the plaintiffs as sons of the deceased.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that once land is registered under the Registered Land Act, the rights of the registered proprietor are absolute and not subject to customary law. The 2nd defendant, as the registered owner of LR NO. GITHUNGURI/GITHIGA/1173, was entitled to subdivide and transfer her land as she wished, including to her daughters. The plaintiffs could not rely on Kikuyu Customary Law to claim the land or to invalidate the transfers. The suit properties were not held in trust for the plaintiffs, and the subdivision and transfer were valid. The plaintiffs' suit was therefore dismissed with costs to the defendants.
Court Disposition
suit dismissed with costs to the defendants
Orders
- The plaintiffs' suit is dismissed.
- Costs awarded to the defendants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
Civil Case 4211 of 1992
ELI JOHN NJOGU WAINAINA & OTHERS…..…………..……....1ST PLAINTIFF
JOHN KARIUKI………………………………….……………….….2ND PLAINTIFF
SAMUEL MUCHIRI…………………………………………….……3RD PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
WANDIA WAINAINA ………………………………………./……. 1ST DEFENDANT
LIZZIE NJERI WAINAINA………………………………….…….2ND DEFENDANT
NAOMI NJOKI NJIHIA……………………………………….……3RD DEFENDANT
EMILY MBAIRE ALLAN…………………………………………..4TH DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
This clam arises out of a dispute over the estate of the late Wainaina Njogu who died in 1952. He was the registered proprietor of the suit landLR NO. GITHUNGURI/GITHIGA/30. He left two widows namely Wandia Wainaina and Lizzie Njeri Wainaina. When he died the two widows filed a Succession Cause and were granted Letters of Administration. The estate of the deceased comprised only of the suit land. The court ordered that they be registered as joint proprietors. In 1980 the two widows petitioned the court to have the suit land subdivided into two houses in accordance to Kikuyu Customary Law so that each could have her share. The subdivision
into two equal portions resulted into LR NO. GITHUNGURI/GITHIGA/1172which was registered in the name of Wandia Wainaina and LR NO. GITHUNGURI/GITHIGA/1173 which was registered in the name of Lizzie Njeri Wainaina.
In 1985 LIZZIE NJERI WAINAINA applied to have her land LR NO. GITHUNGURI/GITHIGA/1173subdivided into two portions resulting inLR NO. GITHUNGURI/GITHIGA/1435 and LR NO.GITHUNGURI/GITHIGA/1436. Since she did not have a son she decided to transfer the two portions to her two daughters. LR NO. GITHUNGURI/GITHIGA/1435 was registered in the name of EMILY MBARIRE whileLR NO. GITHUNGURI/GITHIGA/1436was registered in the name ofNAOMI NJOKI NJIHIA.
The plaintiffs are sons of the deceased Wainaina Njogu of the house of WANDIA WAINAINA.They filed this suit against their own mother WANDIA WAINAINAtheir step mother LIZZIE NJERI WAINAINA and the two step sisters NAOMI NJOKI NJIHIA and EMILY MBARIRE seeking orders for:
(a) A declaration that LR NO.GITHUNGURI/GITHIGA/1172, LR NO.GITHUNGURI/GITHIGA/1435, LR. NO. GITHUNGURI/GITHIGA/1436are held by the second, third and fourth Defendants for the benefit and trust for the plaintiffs.
(b) A declaration that the subdivision and transfer of LR NO. GITHUNGURI/GITHIGA.1173 to the 3rd and 4th Defendants by the 1st Defendant is null and void.
The plaintiff’s claim is based on the Kikuyu Customary Law which give only the sons the right to inherit from their fathers ELI JOHN NJOGU WAINAINAthe 1st plaintiff is the eldest son. He gave evidence on his behalf and on behalf of his brothers the 2nd and 3rd plaintiffs. In his evidence he told the court that the plaintiffs are the only sons of the late Wainaina Njogu and are the only beneficiaries of LR NO. GITHUNGURI/GITHIGA/1435, LR NO. GITHUNGURI/GITHIGA/1436and LR NO. GITHUNGURI/GITHIGA/1172 all of which were derived from the
original parcel LR NO. GITHUNGURI/GITHIGA/30.
The 2nd Defendant was the registered proprietor of LR NO. GIHUNGURI/GITHIGA/1173. Under the provisions of Section 27 of Registered Land Act Cap 300 interest in land is conferred by registration. It provides:-
“27” Subject to this Act –
(a) the registration of a person as the proprietor of land shall vest in that person the absolute ownership of that land together with all rights and privileges belonging or ……….thereto;
(b) …………………………………………….
Once land is registered under the provisions of the Registered Land Act Cap 300, after the Land Adjudication process, customary law ceases to apply. A party cannot invoke the customary law rights to deprive another of land which is registered under the Act.
The 2nd Defendant acted within her legal rights to subdivide her portion of landLR NO. GITHUNGURI/GITHIGA/1173and effect the transfer to her daughters. She could as well have decided to sell the same if she so wished.
For the above reasons the plaintiff’s suit is dismissed with costs to the defendants.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 19th day of September 2005.
J.L.A. OSIEMO
JUDGE