[2017] KEELC 3067 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 3067 (KLR)

The court found that the suit referenced the wrong parcel of land (MUTHAMBI/GATUA sheet one) and that there was no dispute regarding this parcel. The parties agreed by consent that the plaintiff should file a fresh suit concerning the correct parcel (sheet seven) to enable the land officers to assist. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 3067 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Elias Zakayo Nthwiga; Defendant: Director of Land Adjudication and Settlement; Defendant: Land Registrar – Chuka; Defendant: Hon. Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 118 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Ruling on Withdrawal by Consent
Outcome
suit withdrawn by consent
Legal Topics
Land Adjudication, Rectification of Title, Withdrawal of Suit
Source Language
en
Land and Property Land Adjudication Rectification of Title Withdrawal of Suit

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elias Zakayo Nthwiga

Plaintiff

Director of Land Adjudication and Settlement

Defendant

Land Registrar – Chuka

Defendant

Hon. Attorney General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Ruling on Withdrawal by Consent

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to rectification of land records or compensation for the disputed parcel.
  2. 2 Whether the suit should be withdrawn by consent due to error in the parcel referenced.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the suit referenced the wrong parcel of land (MUTHAMBI/GATUA sheet one) and that there was no dispute regarding this parcel. The parties agreed by consent that the plaintiff should file a fresh suit concerning the correct parcel (sheet seven) to enable the land officers to assist. The court adopted the consent as its order, marked the suit as withdrawn, and made no order as to costs. The withdrawal was appropriate as the claim before the court did not pertain to the disputed parcel, and the parties' agreement resolved all issues in the current proceedings.

Court Disposition

suit withdrawn by consent

Orders

  • The consent dated 23.3.2017 is adopted as an order of the court.
  • The suit is marked as withdrawn.