[2018] KEELC 681 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 681 (KLR)

The court found that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the application as it was framed for the High Court and not the Environment and Land Court. Additionally, the application was not supported by sufficient documents to enable the court to make necessary assumptions or determinations. The court held that even...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 681 (KLR)
Parties
Defendant: Elifinias Jackson Ekim Omaido; Plaintiff: Robella Betty Ayode Omaido
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 13 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Sufficiency of Application
Outcome
application struck out for want of jurisdiction
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Court, Striking Out Applications, Procedural Irregularities
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Jurisdiction of Court Striking Out Applications Procedural Irregularities

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elifinias Jackson Ekim Omaido

Defendant

Robella Betty Ayode Omaido

Plaintiff

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Sufficiency of Application

  1. 1 Whether the Environment and Land Court has jurisdiction to entertain the application as framed.
  2. 2 Whether the application is supported by sufficient documents to enable the court make a determination.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the application as it was framed for the High Court and not the Environment and Land Court. Additionally, the application was not supported by sufficient documents to enable the court to make necessary assumptions or determinations. The court held that even the invocation of Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution could not cure the fundamental defect of lack of jurisdiction. Consequently, the proceedings of 15th October 2018 were vacated and the application was struck out.

Court Disposition

application struck out for want of jurisdiction

Orders

  • The proceedings of 15th October 2018 are vacated.
  • The application dated 21/9/2018 is struck out for want of jurisdiction.