[2008] KEHC 1608 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 1608 (KLR)

The court held that the Land Disputes Tribunal Act provides a specific appellate procedure, requiring parties aggrieved by a Tribunal decision to appeal to the Appeals Committee within thirty days. The High Court has no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal directly from the Tribunal. Since the appellant bypassed the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] KEHC 1608 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Elijah Kipsoimo Arap Maritim; Respondent: Alice Jeptoo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 154 of 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Preliminary Objection Ruling
Outcome
Appeal struck out with costs to the respondent.
Judges
AI Tullu
Legal Topics
Land Disputes Tribunal Jurisdiction, Appeals Limitation Period, Res Judicata
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Land Disputes Tribunal Jurisdiction Appeals Limitation Period Res Judicata

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elijah Kipsoimo Arap Maritim

Appellant

Alice Jeptoo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Preliminary Objection Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the appeal is time barred under the Land Disputes Tribunal Act.
  2. 2 Whether the appeal offends the mandatory provisions of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act, No. 18 of 1990.
  3. 3 Whether the issues raised in the appeal are res judicata.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the Land Disputes Tribunal Act provides a specific appellate procedure, requiring parties aggrieved by a Tribunal decision to appeal to the Appeals Committee within thirty days. The High Court has no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal directly from the Tribunal. Since the appellant bypassed the Appeals Committee and filed the appeal out of time, the appeal was incompetent and contrary to the mandatory statutory provisions. The preliminary objection was therefore upheld, and the appeal struck out with costs to the respondent.

Court Disposition

Appeal struck out with costs to the respondent.

Orders

  • The preliminary objection is upheld.
  • The appeal is struck out.