[2010] KEHC 2870 (KLR)
The court held that the Law of Succession Act requires that gifts given inter vivos be considered in the distribution of the estate. Since the protestor's predecessor (Macharia son of Gakuru) had already received LR No. Kirimukuyu/Thui/167 measuring 0.5 acres as a gift from the deceased, the respondent is entitled...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 2870 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Elijah Mahiga Gakuru; Respondent: Mary Wambui Macharia
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 560 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Protest allowed; grant confirmed as per affidavit of protest; each party to bear own costs.
- Judges
- JK Sergon
- Legal Topics
- Intestate Succession, Distribution of Estate, Gifts Inter Vivos
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elijah Mahiga Gakuru
Applicant
Mary Wambui Macharia
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether gifts given inter vivos should be considered in the distribution of the deceased's estate.
- 2 What is the proper mode of distribution of LR No. Konyu/Gachuku/163 between the applicant and the respondent.
- 3 Whether the protestor is entitled to an equal share of the estate as the applicant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Law of Succession Act requires that gifts given inter vivos be considered in the distribution of the estate. Since the protestor's predecessor (Macharia son of Gakuru) had already received LR No. Kirimukuyu/Thui/167 measuring 0.5 acres as a gift from the deceased, the respondent is entitled to an additional 1.2 acres from LR No. Konyu/Gachuku/163 to ensure parity with the applicant. The remainder of 1.7 acres from LR No. Konyu/Gachuku/163 is to go to the applicant. This distribution ensures both parties receive equal shares of the estate, in accordance with section 38 of the Law of Succession Act. The protest was found to have merit and the grant was confirmed as...
Court Disposition
Protest allowed; grant confirmed as per affidavit of protest; each party to bear own costs.
Orders
- The estate is to be distributed such that the respondent receives an additional 1.2 acres from LR No. Konyu/Gachuku/163.
- The applicant receives the remainder 1.7 acres from LR No. Konyu/Gachuku/163.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
14 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI Succession Cause 560 of 2008
[IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GAKURU KIMARU
alias GAKURU s/o KIMARI]
AND
ELIJAH MAHIGA GAKURU..................................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
MARY WAMBUI MACHARIA..........................................................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
ELIJAH MAHIGA GAKURU,the Applicant herein applied for the grant Letters of administration intestate given to him in respect of the estate of Gakuru Kimaru alias Gakuru son of Kimari, deceased on January 2007 to be confirmed. Mary Wambui Macharia filed an affidavit of protest to oppose the summons for confirmation of grant dated 5th August 2007. On 28th January 2010 this court gave directions to hear the protest and the summons determined by affidavit evidence and written submissions.
According to the protestor the property known as Kirimukuyu/Thiu/167 measuring 0. 5 acres was inherited from the deceased. LR No. Konyu/Gachuku/163 measuring 2. 9 acres is the only property available for distribution. In short, the entire land and property of the estate measures 3. 4 acres. It is the protestors’ view that the property be shared equally. The applicant is of the view that the protestor can only be given 0. 5 of an acre from the parcel of land known as Konyu/Gachuku/163.
I have considered the affidavit evidence and the submissions of both sides. The following issues are not in dispute. First is that the protestor is a widow of Macharia son of Gakuru deceased who was a brother to the applicant herein. Secondly that LR No. Kirimukuyu/Thui/167 was given to Macharia s/o Gakuru by the deceased. Thirdly, that the land available for distribution is LR Konyu/Gachuku/163. Fourth, those entitled are the beneficiaries the applicant and respondent herein. According to the applicant he is entitled to inherit 2. 31 acres while as the protestor is entitled to 0. 59 acres. The protestor is of the contrary view that she is entitled to inherit 1. 2 acres to make it 1. 7 acres. Under the Law of Succession Act the law requires that gifts given out intervivos should be taken into account when sharing out the intestate estate. Under section 38 the Law of Succession Act the two should share the property in equal proportions. Taken into account that the late Macharia son of Gakuru had received LR No. Kirimukuyu/Thui/167 measuring 0. 5 acres from the deceased then, his estate represented by the protestor is entitled to receive an additional 1. 2 acres to be excised from LR No. Konyu/Gachuku/163. The remainder 1. 7 acres to go to the applicant. This mode of distribution will make applicant and protestor to be at par. The protest is therefore found to be with merit. The grant is confirmed as proposed in the affidavit of protest. Since the dispute involves family members I order that each party bears its own cost.
Dated and delivered at Nyeri this 16th day of April 2010.
J.K. SERGON
JUDGE