[2021] KECA 894 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had promptly filed the notice of appeal and applied for proceedings within the required period. Although there was a delay in collecting the proceedings, the court accepted the applicant's explanation that the delay was due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which had disrupted court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KECA 894 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Elijah Ochieng Ogui; Respondent: Tobias Omondi
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Application 109 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Extension of time granted.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeal Out of Time, Judicial Discretion, Vacant Possession Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elijah Ochieng Ogui
Applicant
Tobias Omondi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has established sufficient cause for extension of time to file and serve the record of appeal out of time.
- 2 Whether the delay in collecting proceedings and filing the appeal was excusable under the circumstances, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
- 3 Whether granting the extension would prejudice the respondent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had promptly filed the notice of appeal and applied for proceedings within the required period. Although there was a delay in collecting the proceedings, the court accepted the applicant's explanation that the delay was due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which had disrupted court operations. The court held that the delay was not inordinate and that the respondent had not demonstrated any prejudice that could not be compensated by costs. Therefore, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application for extension of time to file and serve the memorandum and record of appeal.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Extension of time granted.
Orders
- The applicant shall file and serve his memorandum and record of appeal within 45 days from the date of delivery of this ruling.
- Costs of the application awarded to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT KISUMU
(CORAM: GATEMBU, JA (IN CHAMBERS))
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 109 OF 2020
BETWEEN
ELIJAH OCHIENG OGUI..........................APPLICANT
AND
TOBIAS OMONDI...................................RESPONDENT
(Being an application for leave to file an appeal out of time
from the judgment of the Environment and Land Court at Kisii
(J.M. Onyango, J.) delivered on 5thMarch, 2020inKisii ELC Case No. 1123 of 2016)
*************************
RULING
1. In his application dated 28th September 2020 made under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, the applicant, Elijah Ochieng Ogui, seeks an order that “leave and time be extended within which to file and serve records of appeal out of time.”
2. The judgment he is intent on challenging is dated 21st February 2020 but was delivered on 5th March 2020 by the Environment and Land Court at Kisii ordering him to vacate and deliver vacant possession of the property known as Title Number Kanyamkago/Kamgundho/1105 within 60 days from the date of delivery of the judgment failing which an eviction order was to issue.
3. I have considered the application alongside the supporting affidavit and submissions as well as the replying affidavit by Joseph Mboya Oguttu, and the respondents’ submissions.
The application calls for exercise of judicial discretion along the principles pronounced in Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat vs. IEBC & 7 others,Supreme Court Application No. 16 of 2014[2014] eKLR, where the Supreme Court of Kenya stated that extension of time is not a right of a party but an equitable remedy available to a deserving party at the discretion of the court; that the party seeking extension of time has the burden to lay a basis to the satisfaction of the court; that extension of time is a consideration on a case to case basis; and that delay should be explained to the satisfaction of the court. The Supreme Court stated further that whether there will be prejudice suffered by the respondents if the extension is granted; whether the application is brought without undue delay; and public interest are matters for consideration.
4. In this case, there is no doubt that the applicant promptly filed a notice of appeal on 6th March 2020, a day after the delivery of the judgment, although the respondent complains that it was not served within 7 days as required under the rules. It is also evident and acknowledged by counsel for the respondent that the applicant applied for the typed proceedings within 30 days of delivery of the judgment and copied the same to the respondents. The respondent however says that notification by the court that the proceedings were ready for collection was given on 6th July 2020 but the applicant’s advocate “went into slumber”and delayed in collecting the same.
5. There is indeed on record a copy of a letter dated 6th July 2020 from the Deputy Registrar, High Court Kisii addressed to the advocates for the applicant notifying that the proceedings were ready for collection on payment of balance of fees of Kshs.1560. 00 which was receipted by the court on 10th September 2020. The applicant says that the delay in collecting the proceedings was not intentional but “due to the pandemic period of Corona Virus in the entire country”, a matter that is contested by the respondents. I am prepared to give the applicant the benefit of doubt alive to the fact that operations of the courts were scaled down during the period in question.
6. I think this is a proper case for the Court to exercise its discretion in favour of the applicant. It has not been demonstrated that the respondent will suffer prejudice, for which an award of costs will not suffice. The present application was filed within the month when the proceedings were collected, and the delay involved in doing so is not inordinate in the circumstances.
7. Consequently, I allow the application. The applicant shall file and serve his memorandum and record of appeal within 45 days from the date of delivery of this ruling. I award the costs of the application to the respondent.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 19thday of March, 2021.
S. GATEMBU KAIRU, (FCIArb)
........................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true
copy of the original.
Signed
DEPUTY REGISTRAR