[2013] KEHC 4022 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 4022 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had obtained a valid tribunal order authorizing the sale of the suit properties due to the respondent's default on loan repayment. The applicant had complied with the necessary procedures and was unable to complete the transfer of the properties solely because the respondent...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 4022 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Elimu Sacco Society Limited; Respondent: Paul W. Mwangi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Case 368 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Adopt Tribunal Order and Execute Transfer Documents
Outcome
Application allowed. Orders granted as prayed.
Judges
DW Mbuteti
Legal Topics
Enforcement of Tribunal Awards, Execution of Decrees, Transfer of Land, Default on Loans
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Enforcement of Tribunal Awards Execution of Decrees Transfer of Land Default on Loans

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elimu Sacco Society Limited

Applicant

Paul W. Mwangi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Adopt Tribunal Order and Execute Transfer Documents

  1. 1 Whether the order of the Cooperative Tribunal can be adopted as an order of the High Court for enforcement purposes.
  2. 2 Whether the Deputy Registrar can be directed to execute transfer documents on behalf of the respondent who has defaulted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had obtained a valid tribunal order authorizing the sale of the suit properties due to the respondent's default on loan repayment. The applicant had complied with the necessary procedures and was unable to complete the transfer of the properties solely because the respondent refused or neglected to execute the required documents. The law empowers the court to adopt the tribunal's order as its own and to direct the Deputy Registrar to execute the transfer documents in place of the respondent. The respondent, having been served, failed to oppose the application or appear. The court was satisfied that the application was meritorious and granted the orders...

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Orders granted as prayed.

Orders

  • The order of the Cooperative Tribunal issued on 13th August 2009 and amended on 15th August 2009 is adopted as an order of the High Court.
  • The Deputy Registrar is directed to execute the transfer documents on behalf of the respondent.