[2021] KEELC 226 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 226 (KLR)

The Environment and Land Court lacks jurisdiction to lift a caution or inhibition registered pursuant to an order issued in a succession cause by a family court. The applicant failed to demonstrate that the event contemplated by the inhibition order had occurred or that the succession cause had been determined. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 226 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Eliphas Mbae Arithi; Respondent: Angela Gatumi Mucheke
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal 35 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Elc Appeal / Ruling on Application to Lift Caution/inhibition
Outcome
application struck out
Legal Topics
Caution Registration, Inhibition Orders, Land Registration Act, Succession Cause Interplay
Source Language
en
Land and Property Caution Registration Inhibition Orders Land Registration Act Succession Cause Interplay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eliphas Mbae Arithi

Appellant

Angela Gatumi Mucheke

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Elc Appeal / Ruling on Application to Lift Caution/inhibition

  1. 1 Whether the Environment and Land Court has jurisdiction to lift a caution or inhibition registered pursuant to orders from a succession cause.
  2. 2 Whether the caution or inhibition registered over L.R No. Nkuene/Mitunguu/861 should be lifted following the determination of the lower court suit and appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant has established that the event contemplated by the inhibition order has occurred.

Ratio Decidendi

The Environment and Land Court lacks jurisdiction to lift a caution or inhibition registered pursuant to an order issued in a succession cause by a family court. The applicant failed to demonstrate that the event contemplated by the inhibition order had occurred or that the succession cause had been determined. The court found that granting the orders sought would amount to judicial overreach, as the inhibition was not issued by this court but by a family/succession court. Consequently, the application to lift the caution or inhibition was struck out.

Court Disposition

application struck out

Orders

  • The application to lift the caution or inhibition is struck out.
  • No order as to costs.