[2003] KEHC 394 (KLR)
The Court determined that, since both parties agreed the appeal would require at least two days for hearing, it was appropriate to remove the matter from the day's list and direct the parties to set it down for a two-day hearing at the Registry. This ensures fairness and adequate opportunity for both sides to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2003] KEHC 394 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Peter Manson Ouko; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 78 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Order for Hearing Date Allocation
- Outcome
- Appeal taken out of today's hearing list and to be set down for hearing for two clear days at the Registry by the parties.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Hearing, Case Management
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Manson Ouko
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Order for Hearing Date Allocation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal should be scheduled for a hearing of sufficient duration.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court determined that, since both parties agreed the appeal would require at least two days for hearing, it was appropriate to remove the matter from the day's list and direct the parties to set it down for a two-day hearing at the Registry. This ensures fairness and adequate opportunity for both sides to present their cases.
Court Disposition
Appeal taken out of today's hearing list and to be set down for hearing for two clear days at the Registry by the parties.
Orders
- The appeal is taken out of today's hearing list.
- The parties are to set down the appeal for hearing for two clear days at the Registry.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT NAIROBI
(CORAM: GICHERU, SHAH & KEIWUA JJ.A)
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.78 OF 2002
BETWEEN
PETER MANSON OUKO .......................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ..............................................RESPONDENT
(Appeal from a conviction and sentence of the High Court
of Kenya at Nairobi (Mr. Justice Etyang) dated 24th
May, 2001
in
H.C.CR.C. NO.54 OF 1999)
*****************
ORDER OF THE COURT
Both learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Wagara and for the Republic Mr. Okumu are agreed that the hearing of this appeal requires at least two days. Accordingly the appeal is taken out of today's hearing list for it to be set down for hearing for two clear days at the Registry by the parties. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 18th day ofSeptember, 2002.
J.E. GICHERU
....................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
A.B. SHAH
....................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
M. OLE KEIWUA
.....................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a
true copy of the original.