[2001] KEHC 81 (KLR)

[2001] KEHC 81 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had demonstrated, through affidavit evidence and submissions, that the respondents were aware of the court order made on 31/1/2001 and had been served with it together with a penal notice. The respondents' subsequent actions, specifically announcing the end year results of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] KEHC 81 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Eliud Mathiu; Plaintiff: John Bosse; Plaintiff: Patrick Muiruri; Plaintiff: J. K. Muthondu; Defendant: George Gareth; Defendant: Peter Nyakiamo; Defendant: Ernest Saina; Defendant: Kirinya Mwendia; Defendant: Albert Mwenda; Defendant: Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd.; Defendant: Kencom House Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 120 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Leave to Commence Contempt Proceedings
Outcome
Application allowed. Leave granted to apply for committal for contempt of court. Costs in the cause.
Judges
T Mbaluto
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Committal Proceedings, Interlocutory Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Committal Proceedings Interlocutory Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eliud Mathiu

Plaintiff

John Bosse

Plaintiff

Patrick Muiruri

Plaintiff

J. K. Muthondu

Plaintiff

George Gareth

Defendant

Peter Nyakiamo

Defendant

Ernest Saina

Defendant

Kirinya Mwendia

Defendant

Albert Mwenda

Defendant

Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd.

Defendant

Kencom House Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Leave to Commence Contempt Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to leave to apply for committal of the respondents for contempt of court.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents violated the court order made on 31/1/2001 by treating proceeds of the sale of Kencom House as paid and received.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had demonstrated, through affidavit evidence and submissions, that the respondents were aware of the court order made on 31/1/2001 and had been served with it together with a penal notice. The respondents' subsequent actions, specifically announcing the end year results of the sixth defendant and reflecting the proceeds of the sale of Kencom House as paid and received, constituted a prima facie violation of the said order. The court was satisfied that the applicants had met the threshold for grant of leave to commence contempt proceedings. Accordingly, the application was allowed and leave granted to the applicants to apply for an order of committal to...

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Leave granted to apply for committal for contempt of court. Costs in the cause.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicants to apply for an order of committal to civil jail of the defendants/respondents for contempt of court as prayed.
  • Costs of the application will be in the cause.