https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/10188
The applicant remained in custody from arrest until conviction, and the trial court record showed no indication that this remand period was considered in sentencing; therefore, under the mandatory proviso to section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the High Court revised the sentence to run from the date of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 10188 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Eliya Nateleng Nabuni; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision E099 of 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Sentence Review/revision Application
- Outcome
- Application allowed.
- Judges
- ["DR Kavedza"]
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Pre Trial Custody Credit, Revision, Section 333(2) Criminal Procedure Code
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eliya Nateleng Nabuni
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Sentence Review/revision Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing court failed to comply with section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code by not crediting time spent in remand custody.
- 2 Whether the High Court should revise the commencement date of the sentence to account for pre-trial custody.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant remained in custody from arrest until conviction, and the trial court record showed no indication that this remand period was considered in sentencing; therefore, under the mandatory proviso to section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the High Court revised the sentence to run from the date of arrest.
Court Disposition
Application allowed.
Orders
- The sentence imposed by the trial court shall run from 4th August 2025, the date of the applicant's arrest.
- Orders accordingly.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Nabuni v Republic (Criminal Revision E099 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 10188 (KLR) (13 July 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 10188 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the High Court at Kibera Criminal Revision E099 of 2026 DR Kavedza, J July 13, 2026 Between Eliya Nateleng Nabuni Applicant and Republic Respondent Ruling 1.The applicant was charged and convicted of the offence of obtaining money by false pretenses contrary to section 313 of the Penal Code. He was sentenced to serve two (2) years imprisonment. 2.The applicant has filed the present application dated 3rd June 2026 seeking sentence review. He contends that the trial court failed to consider the period spent in remand custody before sentencing, contrary to section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. He therefore urges the Court to revise the commencement date of his sentence. 3.I have considered the application, the grounds advanced, the record and the applicable law. 4.The proviso to section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code imposes a mandatory duty on a sentencing court to consider the period an accused person has spent in lawful custody before sentence. This principle has been affirmed by the Court of Appeal in Ahamad Abolfathi Mohammed & Another v Republic [2018] eKLR and Bethwel Wilson Kibor v Republic [2009] eKLR, and by the High Court in Vincent Sila Jona & 87 Others v Kenya Prison Service & 2 Others [2021] eKLR. 5.It is therefore mandatory upon every sentencing court to consider the period spent in pre-trial custody unless the law expressly provides otherwise. 6.The record shows that the applicant was arrested on 4th August 2025 and remained in custody throughout the trial until his conviction on 31st March 2026, having never been released on bond or bail. I have examined the original trial court record and find no indication that the learned trial magistrate took the period spent in remand custody into account when passing sentence. The omission warrants this Court's intervention under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. 7.Consequently, the application is merited and is hereby allowed. The sentence imposed by the trial court shall run from 4th August 2025, being the date of the applicant's arrest, in accordance with section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, Cap. 75. Laws of Kenya.Orders accordingly. RULING DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 13TH JULY 2026D. KAVEDZAJUDGEIn the presence of:Applicant PresentMutuma for the RespondentKarimi Court Assistant