[2008] KEHC 2756 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 2756 (KLR)

The court found that there was no real and reasonable opposition to the defendants' application to dismiss the consolidated suits for want of prosecution. The plaintiff's counsel admitted inability to trace the plaintiff and did not oppose the application. In the absence of prosecution and opposition, the court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] KEHC 2756 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Cook; Plaintiff: Damain Cook; Defendant: Stewart Keith Eltringham; Defendant: Peter Mervyn Johnson; Defendant: Thomas Gulifoyle; Defendant: Ellis Thomas Monks; Defendant: Jeans Esme Aucutt; Defendant: Robert Thomas Clifford Guilfoyle
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 67 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
Plaintiffs' consolidated suits dismissed for want of prosecution.
Judges
JM Khamoni
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Case Management, Delay in Prosecution
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Case Management Delay in Prosecution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elizabeth Cook

Plaintiff

Damain Cook

Plaintiff

Stewart Keith Eltringham

Defendant

Peter Mervyn Johnson

Defendant

Thomas Gulifoyle

Defendant

Ellis Thomas Monks

Defendant

Jeans Esme Aucutt

Defendant

Robert Thomas Clifford Guilfoyle

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the consolidated suits should be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was no real and reasonable opposition to the defendants' application to dismiss the consolidated suits for want of prosecution. The plaintiff's counsel admitted inability to trace the plaintiff and did not oppose the application. In the absence of prosecution and opposition, the court granted the application and dismissed the suits as prayed.

Court Disposition

Plaintiffs' consolidated suits dismissed for want of prosecution.

Orders

  • The defendants' Notice of Motion dated 4th October, 2007 is granted as prayed.
  • The plaintiffs' consolidated suits are dismissed for want of prosecution.