[2013] KEHC 3138 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 3138 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had not complied with the mandatory requirements of Order 3 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules by failing to supply the required statements and documents. Furthermore, after her counsel ceased acting for her, the plaintiff took no steps to prosecute the case and did not respond to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 3138 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Mwendia Njuki; Defendant: Boniface Njuki Runji Alias Boniface N. Gichoni
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Embu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 64 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
Judges
HI Ong'udi
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Non Compliance With Civil Procedure Rules, Affidavit of Service
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Non Compliance With Civil Procedure Rules Affidavit of Service

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elizabeth Mwendia Njuki

Plaintiff

Boniface Njuki Runji Alias Boniface N. Gichoni

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff complied with Order 3 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff has lost interest in the suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had not complied with the mandatory requirements of Order 3 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules by failing to supply the required statements and documents. Furthermore, after her counsel ceased acting for her, the plaintiff took no steps to prosecute the case and did not respond to the application for dismissal despite being duly served. The court concluded that the plaintiff had lost interest in the suit and that the continued pendency of the matter was unjustified. Consequently, the suit was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Court Disposition

Suit dismissed for want of prosecution.

Orders

  • The suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
  • Each party to bear his/her own costs.