[2016] KEELRC 193 (KLR)

[2016] KEELRC 193 (KLR)

The court found that the Respondent failed to comply with the mandatory requirements of Section 40 of the Employment Act regarding redundancy. There was no evidence of notice to the Claimant or the Labour Office, and the redundancy was not shown to be genuine, as another Clinical Officer was hired in the Claimant's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEELRC 193 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Elizabeth Nduku; Respondent: The Mother Superior Mary Immaculate Sisters
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 856 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
claim_partially_allowed
Judges
J Rika
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Redundancy Procedure, Severance Pay, Annual Leave Entitlement
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Redundancy Procedure Severance Pay Annual Leave Entitlement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elizabeth Nduku

Claimant

The Mother Superior Mary Immaculate Sisters

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Was the termination of the Claimant's employment based on a genuine redundancy and executed in accordance with Section 40 of the Employment Act?
  2. 2 Was the Claimant entitled to severance pay, notice pay, annual leave pay, and compensation for unfair termination?
  3. 3 Did the Respondent comply with statutory requirements regarding redundancy and notification?

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Respondent failed to comply with the mandatory requirements of Section 40 of the Employment Act regarding redundancy. There was no evidence of notice to the Claimant or the Labour Office, and the redundancy was not shown to be genuine, as another Clinical Officer was hired in the Claimant's place. The Claimant was not paid severance pay, annual leave, or pro-rata leave. The court held that the termination was unfair and not grounded on a genuine redundancy. The Claimant was therefore entitled to compensation equivalent to 12 months’ salary for unfair termination, notice pay, severance pay calculated at 15 days’ salary for one year of service, annual leave pay for...

Court Disposition

claim_partially_allowed

Orders

  • Termination was unfair.
  • Respondent to pay Claimant: 12 months’ salary in compensation for unfair termination (Kshs. 312,000), notice pay (Kshs. 26,000), severance pay (Kshs. 15,000), annual leave pay (Kshs. 21,000), and pro-rata annual leave pay (Kshs. 10,500), totaling Kshs. 384,500.