[2015] KEHC 6300 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 6300 (KLR)

The court held that the summons for revocation of grant was premature because the grant ad litem issued to the applicant was limited solely to the filing of suit and did not authorize the distribution of the estate or any part thereof. The objector/respondent should await the issuance of a full grant before raising...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 6300 (KLR)
Parties
Objector: Elizabeth Wanjiku Muchira; Applicant: Josephine Egwa Mbela
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Separation Cause 1874 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Strike Out Summons for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
summons for revocation struck out with costs to applicant
Judges
LA Achode
Legal Topics
Succession, Grant of Letters of Administration, Revocation of Grant, Continuing Trust, Abuse of Court Process
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Grant of Letters of Administration Revocation of Grant Continuing Trust Abuse of Court Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elizabeth Wanjiku Muchira

Objector

Josephine Egwa Mbela

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Strike Out Summons for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the summons for revocation of grant was properly before the court given the limited nature of the grant ad litem.
  2. 2 Whether the grant ad litem issued to the applicant could be revoked before a full grant is issued.
  3. 3 Whether the summons for revocation constituted an abuse of court process.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the summons for revocation of grant was premature because the grant ad litem issued to the applicant was limited solely to the filing of suit and did not authorize the distribution of the estate or any part thereof. The objector/respondent should await the issuance of a full grant before raising any objection regarding the administration or distribution of the estate. As such, the application for revocation was not properly before the court at this stage and amounted to an abuse of the court process. The court therefore struck out the summons for revocation with costs to the applicant.

Court Disposition

summons for revocation struck out with costs to applicant

Orders

  • The summons for revocation filed on 20th September 2012 is struck out.
  • Costs awarded to the applicant in the Notice of Motion dated 19th February 2014.