[2017] KEELC 2297 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 2297 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated a prima facie interest in the suit properties by virtue of a written sale agreement and long-term possession. The risk of the land being further alienated or transferred by the defendants, who had already subdivided and transferred the land without regard to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 2297 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Elizaphan Nthiiri Reri; Defendant: Dynah Kangai Albert (sued as administratrix of the estate of Albert Murera Ngaruni); Defendant: Felix Kirimi Mucheke (sued as beneficiary of the estate of Albert Murera Ngarumi); Defendant: Joseline Ciautegi Mucheke (sued as beneficiary of the estate of Albert Murera Ngarumi); Defendant: Rose Cirindi Albert (sued as beneficiary of the estate of Albert Murera Ngarumi); Defendant: Bessu Kanjiru Albert (sued as beneficiary of the estate of Albert Murera Ngarumi); Defendant: Lisper Kendi Mucheke (sued as beneficiary of the estate of Albert Murera Ngarumi)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 268 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ex Parte Interlocutory Application for Inhibition Order
Outcome
interim inhibition order granted ex parte
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Land Inhibition Orders, Succession and Administration, Trusts in Land, Land Sale Agreements
Source Language
en
Land and Property Adverse Possession Land Inhibition Orders Succession and Administration Trusts in Land Land Sale Agreements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elizaphan Nthiiri Reri

Plaintiff

Dynah Kangai Albert (sued as administratrix of the estate of Albert Murera Ngaruni)

Defendant

Felix Kirimi Mucheke (sued as beneficiary of the estate of Albert Murera Ngarumi)

Defendant

Joseline Ciautegi Mucheke (sued as beneficiary of the estate of Albert Murera Ngarumi)

Defendant

Rose Cirindi Albert (sued as beneficiary of the estate of Albert Murera Ngarumi)

Defendant

Bessu Kanjiru Albert (sued as beneficiary of the estate of Albert Murera Ngarumi)

Defendant

Lisper Kendi Mucheke (sued as beneficiary of the estate of Albert Murera Ngarumi)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ex Parte Interlocutory Application for Inhibition Order

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an inhibition order against the suit properties pending determination of the main suit.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has established a prima facie case for preservation of the suit land through inhibition.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant has demonstrated an interest in the suit land by virtue of purchase and/or adverse possession.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated a prima facie interest in the suit properties by virtue of a written sale agreement and long-term possession. The risk of the land being further alienated or transferred by the defendants, who had already subdivided and transferred the land without regard to the applicant's claimed interest, justified the issuance of an inhibition order. The court held that preservation of the suit land was necessary to prevent prejudice to the applicant's claim pending full hearing and determination of the main suit. Accordingly, the court granted an inhibition order against the suit parcels to maintain the status quo.

Court Disposition

interim inhibition order granted ex parte

Orders

  • Prayer 2 for inhibition pending hearing and determination of this application is granted.
  • Costs shall be in the cause.