[2021] KEELRC 2064 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 2064 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent company was deliberately shut down to defeat the judgment of the court. This constituted an abuse of the corporate structure, justifying the lifting of the corporate veil. The directors were therefore held personally liable for the decretal sum and the costs of the application, as...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 2064 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Elly Barasa Ochieng; Respondent: Gallant Security Services Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 911 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Application to Lift Corporate Veil
Outcome
application granted
Judges
AN Makau
Legal Topics
Lifting Corporate Veil, Director Liability, Enforcement of Judgment
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Lifting Corporate Veil Director Liability Enforcement of Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elly Barasa Ochieng

Applicant

Gallant Security Services Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Application to Lift Corporate Veil

  1. 1 Whether the corporate veil should be lifted to hold the directors personally liable for the decretal sum and costs.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent company was deliberately shut down to defeat the judgment of the court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent company was deliberately shut down to defeat the judgment of the court. This constituted an abuse of the corporate structure, justifying the lifting of the corporate veil. The directors were therefore held personally liable for the decretal sum and the costs of the application, as the interests of justice required that the judgment not be frustrated by the misuse of the company form.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • The corporate veil is lifted.
  • The directors of the respondent company are personally liable for payment of the decretal sum in the judgment and the costs of this application.