[2023] KEELC 17479 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 17479 (KLR)

The court found that the Notice of Withdrawal filed by the petitioners was properly filed and served upon all concerned parties as required by Order 25 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Consequently, the court marked the suit as withdrawn and ordered that it should not be reintroduced in the Environment and Land...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 17479 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ali Said Elmi; Applicant: Mohamed Abdi Ahmed; Respondent: Cabinet Secretary Ministry of Land & Physical Planning; Respondent: Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Isiolo
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Petition 12 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Withdrawal of Suit
Outcome
Suit withdrawn by notice; marked as withdrawn; no order as to costs.
Judges
PM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Land Adjudication, Administrative Action, Constitutional Rights, Judicial Review
Source Language
en
Land and Property Constitutional Law Land Adjudication Administrative Action Constitutional Rights Judicial Review

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ali Said Elmi

Applicant

Mohamed Abdi Ahmed

Applicant

Cabinet Secretary Ministry of Land & Physical Planning

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Withdrawal of Suit

  1. 1 Whether the 1st Respondent's actions under Legal Notice No.150 of 2019 violated the Constitution.
  2. 2 Whether the petitioners are entitled to declaratory, certiorari, and prohibition orders against the 1st Respondent.
  3. 3 Whether the withdrawal of the suit was properly filed and served in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Notice of Withdrawal filed by the petitioners was properly filed and served upon all concerned parties as required by Order 25 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Consequently, the court marked the suit as withdrawn and ordered that it should not be reintroduced in the Environment and Land Court. No orders as to costs were made. The court did not address the substantive constitutional or land adjudication issues, as the withdrawal rendered them moot.

Court Disposition

Suit withdrawn by notice; marked as withdrawn; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • This suit is hereby marked as withdrawn and should not be reintroduced in the ELC Court.
  • No costs are awarded.