[2019] KEHC 2161 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 2161 (KLR)

The court held that it lacks jurisdiction to review its own sentencing orders in the absence of a specific legal provision granting such power. The applicants' time already served in custody does not create a legal basis for review. The petition was therefore found to be without merit and dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 2161 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Elphas Kengo Onyango; Applicant: Enos Kalo Akute; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Petition 33 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Petition / Ruling on Petition for Review of Sentence
Outcome
petition dismissed
Judges
TW Cherere
Legal Topics
Sentence Review, Resentencing, Jurisdiction of High Court
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentence Review Resentencing Jurisdiction of High Court

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elphas Kengo Onyango

Applicant

Enos Kalo Akute

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Petition / Ruling on Petition for Review of Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to review its own sentence after resentencing.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants' period in custody justifies a review of sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that it lacks jurisdiction to review its own sentencing orders in the absence of a specific legal provision granting such power. The applicants' time already served in custody does not create a legal basis for review. The petition was therefore found to be without merit and dismissed.

Court Disposition

petition dismissed

Orders

  • The petition for review of sentence is dismissed.