[2023] KEMC 62 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioner had established the grounds for dissolution of marriage as provided under Section 66 of the Marriage Act, 2014, including irretrievable breakdown, desertion, cruelty, and adultery. The court noted the absence of any intention by either party to salvage the marriage and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEMC 62 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: EM; Respondent: KKJ
- Court
- Magistrate's Court
- Court Station
- Chief Magistrate's Court (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause E125 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed; marriage dissolved
- Judges
- JP Aduke
- Legal Topics
- Dissolution of Marriage, Irretrievable Breakdown, Desertion, Cruelty, Adultery
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
EM
Applicant
KKJ
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage between the parties has irretrievably broken down and merits dissolution under the Marriage Act, 2014.
- 2 Whether the grounds of desertion, adultery, and cruelty have been established to warrant divorce.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner had established the grounds for dissolution of marriage as provided under Section 66 of the Marriage Act, 2014, including irretrievable breakdown, desertion, cruelty, and adultery. The court noted the absence of any intention by either party to salvage the marriage and the prolonged separation and antagonism between the parties. Relying on established legal principles and previous case law, the court held that it cannot compel parties to remain in a marriage where one party categorically seeks dissolution. Accordingly, the petition was allowed, and the marriage was ordered dissolved.
Court Disposition
petition allowed; marriage dissolved
Orders
- The marriage between EM and KKJ is hereby dissolved.
- Decree nisi to issue and be made absolute in 30 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
EM v KKJ (Divorce Cause E125 of 2022) [2023] KEMC 62 (KLR) (23 March 2023) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEMC 62 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Chief Magistrate's Court (Milimani Law Courts)
Divorce Cause E125 of 2022
JP Aduke, SRM
March 23, 2023
Between
EM
Petitioner
and
KKJ
Respondent
Judgment
1. The petition filed the petition dated January 5, 2022 seeking a divorce on grounds of desertion, adultery, cruelty and irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. Return of service on record shows that the respondent was served with the petition and annexures thereto. The respondent neither entered appearance nor filed a response. The petitioner filed an application seeking to have the petition proceed undefended. Return of service on record shows the petitioner served the respondent with the said application. These proceedings proceeded undefended.
2. The brief facts of this case are contained in paragraph 1-12 of the petition on record. In summary EM and KKJ solemnized their marriage on November 22, 2019 at the Office of the Registrar of Marriages. They have nil issues together from the union. Both the Petitioner and the Respondent are domiciled in Kenya. The parties have no intentions of salvaging the marriage. The particulars of the grounds for divorce are outlined as follows:1. Irretrievable breakdown of marriage;2. Desertion;3. Cruelty;4. Adultery;
3. At the hearing thereof, the petitioner relied on her petition and verifying affidavit on record as evidence in support of the petition for the divorce. Notably, the petitioner averred that the contents of the petition remained true as at the date of hearing. She prayed for an order of dissolution of the marriage.
4. The issue for determination before this court is whether or not the marriage between the parties merits an order of divorce under theMarriage Act2014.
5. The applicable law is Section 66 of theMarriage Act(on dissolution of Civil Marriages) which provides that the court may grant separation or divorce on the following grounds:1. Adultery by the other spouse2. Cruelty by the other spouse3. Exception depravity by the other spouse4. Desertion by the other spouse5. The irretrievable breakdown of the marriage
6. I have considered the particulars of the grounds outlined in the petition and how those have contributed to the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage as contemplated under section 66 of the marriage Act. I have also noted the length of the physical separation of the couple herein, the levels of antagonism between the parties and relied on the reasoning of the court inJSM vs ENB (2015). With respect to intention to salvage the union, I have noted the unequivocal terms of para 8 of the petition on lack of such intention. The reasoning of the court in ROK V MJB and TPH v NVS 2017 eKLR cannot be emphasized enough-“ marriage is a voluntary union…..this court cannot by any means order or compel the parties to remain married when the petitioner has categorically stated that she wants the same dissolved….” Seeing as this court cannot force two adults to live together when there is no more love between them, I allow the petition dated January 5, 2022 on the following terms:1. The marriage between the two be hereby dissolved.2. Decree nisi do issue to be made absolute in 30 days.3. This being a family matter, each party to bear their own costs.
JUDGMENT DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 23RD MARCH 2023 AT 0842HRS.ADUKE JEAL PRAXADES ATIENOSENIOR RESIDENT MAGISTRATE