[2013] KEELC 28 (KLR)

[2013] KEELC 28 (KLR)

The court found that although the application for substitution was filed outside the one-year period prescribed by Order 24 Rule 4(3), there was no opposition from the other parties and no serious prejudice would be caused by allowing the substitution. The court also noted some doubt as to whether the cause of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEELC 28 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Emily Misoi; Defendant: The Director Sambu Farm & 3 Others; Defendant: Wilfred Kimeli Keter (substituted for Kipketer arap Songol, deceased)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 51 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Application for Substitution of Deceased Defendant
Outcome
Application for substitution allowed.
Legal Topics
Substitution of Parties, Survival of Cause of Action, Letters of Administration, Procedural Timelines
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Substitution of Parties Survival of Cause of Action Letters of Administration Procedural Timelines

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Emily Misoi

Plaintiff

The Director Sambu Farm & 3 Others

Defendant

Wilfred Kimeli Keter (substituted for Kipketer arap Songol, deceased)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Application for Substitution of Deceased Defendant

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be substituted as the 2nd defendant in place of the deceased Kipketer arap Songol.
  2. 2 Whether the application for substitution, filed out of time, should be allowed given the absence of opposition and potential prejudice.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although the application for substitution was filed outside the one-year period prescribed by Order 24 Rule 4(3), there was no opposition from the other parties and no serious prejudice would be caused by allowing the substitution. The court also noted some doubt as to whether the cause of action survived against the deceased, who was sued as a director, but determined that allowing the substitution would not result in serious harm. Consequently, the application for substitution was allowed and Wilfred Kimeli Keter was permitted to be substituted as the 2nd defendant in place of Kipketer arap Songol (deceased). No order as to costs was made.

Court Disposition

Application for substitution allowed.

Orders

  • Wilfred Kimeli Keter is substituted as the 2nd defendant in place of Kipketer arap Songol (deceased).
  • The suit shall proceed on that premise.