[2018] KEELC 4646 (KLR)
The court found that the registration of land parcel KABARE/NGIROCHE/254 in the name of the 1st defendant was procured fraudulently, as it was based on a succession cause unrelated to the deceased. The subsequent transfer to the 2nd defendant was equally tainted by fraud. The removal of restrictions on the land was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELC 4646 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Emily Wanjira Tumbo (Suing as the Legal Representative and Administratrix of the Estate of Muthumbi Wanderi Alias Douglas Tumbo Wanderi); Defendant: Shandrack Mwangi Ethan; Defendant: Leonard Munene Mwaniki
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kerugoya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 183 “A” of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Land and Property Suit / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff; registration of the suit land in the 1st and 2nd defendants' names declared null and void; register to be rectified to revert to the deceased.
- Judges
- BN Olao
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Transfer of Land, Rectification of Register, Succession and Administration, Protection of Title, Removal of Restrictions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Emily Wanjira Tumbo (Suing as the Legal Representative and Administratrix of the Estate of Muthumbi Wanderi Alias Douglas Tumbo Wanderi)
Plaintiff
Shandrack Mwangi Ethan
Defendant
Leonard Munene Mwaniki
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the registration of land parcel KABARE/NGIROCHE/254 in the name of the 1st defendant was fraudulent and therefore null and void.
- 2 Whether the 2nd defendant obtained good title to the suit land.
- 3 Whether the register should be rectified to revert the land to the deceased's name.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the registration of land parcel KABARE/NGIROCHE/254 in the name of the 1st defendant was procured fraudulently, as it was based on a succession cause unrelated to the deceased. The subsequent transfer to the 2nd defendant was equally tainted by fraud. The removal of restrictions on the land was also achieved through fraudulent means, as the party who placed the restriction was not a party to the proceedings that led to its removal. Consequently, the 2nd defendant could not benefit from the protection of title under Section 26(1) of the Land Registration Act. The plaintiff, having established her case on a balance of probabilities and the suit being undefended, was...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff; registration of the suit land in the 1st and 2nd defendants' names declared null and void; register to be rectified to revert to the deceased.
Orders
- A declaration that the registration of land parcel No. KABARE/NGIROCHE/254 in the names of the 1st defendant was fraudulent and therefore null and void ab initio and that there was no good title to pass to the 2nd defendant.
- An order for the rectification of the register of land parcel No. KABARE/NGIROCHE/254 by cancellation of the names of the 2nd defendant and to revert to Muthumbi Wanderi (deceased).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
38 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMETN AND LAND COURT
AT KERUGOYA
ELC CASE NO. 183 “A” OF 2014
EMILY WANJIRA TUMBO (Suing as the Legal
Representative and Administratrix of the Estate of
MUTHUMBI WANDERI Alias DOUGLAS TUMBO
WANDERI (DECEASED).............................................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
SHANDRACK MWANGI ETHAN.......................................1ST DEFENDANT
LEONARD MUNENE MWANIKI.......................................2ND DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
By a plaint dated 4th June 2014 and filed herein on 6th June 2014, the plaintiff, suing as the legal representative and/or administratrix of the Estate of the late MUTHUMBI WANDERI aka DOUGLAS TUMBO WANDERI (the deceased) filed this suit against the two defendants seeking judgment in the following terms:
(a)A declaration that the registration of land parcel number KABARE/NGIROCHE/254 in the names of the 1st defendant was fraudulent and therefore null and void ab initio and therefore there was no title to pass to the 2nd defendant or any other person.
(b)Rectification of the register of land parcel number KABARE/NGIROCHE/254 by cancellation of the name of the 2nd defendant or any other person currently registered and to revert to MUTHUMBI WANDERI deceased.
(c)Costs of the suit with interest.
The record shows that on 22nd August 2014, the firm of KIGURU KAHIGAH Advocates entered appearance on behalf of the defendants but no defence was filed and so on 8th October 2014, interlocutory judgment was entered against the defendants. On 2nd September 2014, the defendants filed a notice of withdrawal of their advocate and indicated that future correspondences be addressed to them in person.
When the matter came up for formal proof on 28th September 2015, I directed that the defendants be served and also allowed an oral application by counsel for the plaintiff to serve them by registered post and fixed the hearing for 26th November 2015 but the Court was not sitting on that day and an ex-parte hearing date was taken for 13th April 2016 and the defendants were duly served but did not turn up.
The case was however adjourned to 8th September 2016 as the plaintiff was absent. The trial did not proceed to hearing on that day and was fixed for hearing on 24th January 2018 when the defendants, though duly served again, did not attend Court.
The plaintiff who is the wife to the deceased asked the Court to rely on her statement and the documents filed in support of her case.
It is clear from that statement dated 4th June 2014 and the documentary exhibits No. 1 to 6 that the deceased died on 6th April 1985 and the plaintiff obtained a limited grant of letters of administration in respect of his Estate on 12th May 2014 vide KERUGOYA HIGH COURT SUCCESSION CAUSE No. 44 of 2013 (Exhibit 1). Prior to his death, the deceased was the registered proprietor of land parcel No. KABARE/NGIROCHE/254 (the suit land) as per the Green Card (Exhibit 2). However, sometime in 2012, the plaintiff heard rumours that the suit land had been registered in the names of another person and so she placed a restriction on the land. She later discovered that the suit land had been registered in the names of the 1st defendant on 19th September 2008 pursuant to a certificate of confirmation issued in NYERI HIGH COURT SUCCESSION CAUSE No. 89 of 2007. However, upon perusal of that case file, it transpired that it was in respect to the Estate of one JAMES MWENDIA KARIUKI and not the deceased. The plaintiff further discovered that the restrictions placed on the suit land were removed pursuant to consent orders issued in KERUGOYA SENIOR PRINCIPAL MAGISTRATE’S COURT MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. 84 of 2012 in which the 1st defendant was the Applicant and the 2nd defendant the Respondent yet the person who placed the restrictions was not a party. The suit land was subsequently transferred by the 1st defendant to the 2nd defendant fraudulently thus giving rise to this suit.
The suit, as I have already indicated above, was not defended and so the plaintiff’s averments of fraud as levelled against the two defendants in paragraph five (5) of the plaint are not controverted. This Court therefore has no reason to doubt the veracity of those allegations.
A perusal of the documentary exhibits produced by the plaintiff further confirms that indeed the suit land was fraudulently transferred by the 1st defendant to the 2nd defendant. It is clear from the Green Card (Exhibit 2) that the suit land was since 8th December 1958 registered in the names of the deceased. However, on 19th September 2008, it was transferred to the 1st defendant on the strength of orders issued in NYERI HIGH COURT SUCCESSION CAUSE No. 89 of 2007. The grant of letters of administration issued in that case show however that it was in respect of the Estate of one JAMES MWENDIA KARIUKI and not the deceased in this case. (Exhibit 4). It is also not clear how the Principal Magistrate Kerugoya could have removed the restrictions on the suit land vide orders issued in SENIOR PRINCIPAL MAGISTRATE’S MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. 84 of 2012 (Exhibit 6) yet none of the parties therein had placed the restriction on the suit land. That order was therefore obtained fraudulently.
It is clear from the above that whereas the 2nd defendant is the current registered proprietor of the suit land, that registration cannot benefit from the protection accorded by Section 26 (1) of the Land Registration Act because it was obtained fraudulently.
The plaintiff has established her case against the defendants as required in law and I therefore enter judgment for her against the defendants jointly and severally in the following terms:
1. A declaration that the registration of land parcel No. KABARE/NGIROCHE/254 in the names of the 1st defendant was fraudulent and therefore null and void ab initio and that there was no good title to pass to the 2nd defendant.
2. An order for the rectification of the register of land parcel No. KABARE/NGORICHE/254 by cancellation of the names of the 2nd defendant and to revert to MUTHUMBI WANDERI – deceased.
3. No order as to costs.
B.N. OLAO
JUDGE
26TH JANUARY, 2018
Judgment dated, delivered and signed in open Court this 26th day of January 2018 at Kerugoya
Mr. Ngigi for Mr. Kagio for Plaintiff present
No appearance for Defendants
Plaintiff present.
B.N. OLAO
JUDGE
26TH JANUARY, 2018