[2019] KEHC 7139 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 7139 (KLR)

The court held that the amended plaint, having been filed after interlocutory judgment and without leave of court, could not be considered and ought to be struck out. However, recognizing that the plaintiff may have had good reason for seeking the amendment, the court found it just and fair not to proceed to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 7139 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: William Barua Nyambu (Suing as Legal Administrator of the Estate of Kahunda Kono Karisa-Deceased); Defendant: Emmanuel Kazungu Chai; Defendant: Hassan Katana Charo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 32 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Interlocutory Order on Amended Plaint and Interlocutory Judgment
Outcome
File remitted to Malindi High Court for further procedural steps by plaintiff before judgment.
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Interlocutory Judgment, Leave of Court
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Amendment of Pleadings Interlocutory Judgment Leave of Court

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Barua Nyambu (Suing as Legal Administrator of the Estate of Kahunda Kono Karisa-Deceased)

Plaintiff

Emmanuel Kazungu Chai

Defendant

Hassan Katana Charo

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Interlocutory Order on Amended Plaint and Interlocutory Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the amended plaint filed after interlocutory judgment and without leave of court is valid.
  2. 2 Whether the court should proceed to write judgment based on the original plaint.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the amended plaint, having been filed after interlocutory judgment and without leave of court, could not be considered and ought to be struck out. However, recognizing that the plaintiff may have had good reason for seeking the amendment, the court found it just and fair not to proceed to judgment based on the original plaint. Instead, the matter was remitted to the Malindi High Court for the plaintiff to take appropriate procedural steps before judgment could be written.

Court Disposition

File remitted to Malindi High Court for further procedural steps by plaintiff before judgment.

Orders

  • The amended plaint is struck out as it was filed without leave after interlocutory judgment.
  • No judgment will be written based on the original plaint at this stage.