[2018] KECA 230 (KLR)

[2018] KECA 230 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal affirmed that it possesses the jurisdiction to grant bail pending a second appeal under Rule 5(2)(a) of the Court of Appeal Rules, provided there is a substantial point of law to be argued that could result in the conviction being quashed. However, upon reviewing the record and grounds of appeal,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KECA 230 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Emmanuel Ochieng Awuondo; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 156 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Bail Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
AM Githinji, GG Okwengu, A Mohammed
Legal Topics
Bail Pending Appeal, Second Appeal Jurisdiction, Trafficking in Narcotics, Burden of Proof
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Bail Pending Appeal Second Appeal Jurisdiction Trafficking in Narcotics Burden of Proof

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Emmanuel Ochieng Awuondo

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Bail Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to grant bail pending a second appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient grounds for bail pending appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant's medical condition justifies release on bail pending appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal affirmed that it possesses the jurisdiction to grant bail pending a second appeal under Rule 5(2)(a) of the Court of Appeal Rules, provided there is a substantial point of law to be argued that could result in the conviction being quashed. However, upon reviewing the record and grounds of appeal, the Court found that the applicant had not demonstrated the existence of such a substantial point of law. The applicant's assertion of ill health was unsupported by medical documentation, and the factual findings of the lower courts regarding the applicant's presence in the vehicle where narcotics were found were not sufficiently challenged. Consequently, the threshold for...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for bail pending appeal is dismissed.