[2019] KEHC 11376 (KLR)
The court found that although the applicant is presumed innocent, his history of repeated similar offences across multiple cases and failure to learn from previous mistakes indicated a high likelihood of re-offending. The court considered the bond terms already granted to be reasonable and not excessive. Therefore,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 11376 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Emmanuel Ojuki Otieno; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision 443 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Consolidation and Variation of Bail Terms
- Outcome
- application dismissed with partial variation of bond terms
- Legal Topics
- Bail Terms, Bond Variation, Repeat Offending, Presumption of Innocence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Emmanuel Ojuki Otieno
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Consolidation and Variation of Bail Terms
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to consolidation of bail terms across multiple related criminal cases.
- 2 Whether the bond terms in Criminal Case No. 1969 of 2015 should be varied in light of the applicant's circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the applicant is presumed innocent, his history of repeated similar offences across multiple cases and failure to learn from previous mistakes indicated a high likelihood of re-offending. The court considered the bond terms already granted to be reasonable and not excessive. Therefore, it was not prudent to consolidate the bond terms for all cases. However, the court exercised discretion to vary the bond terms in Criminal Case No. 1969 of 2015 to align with those in other cases, ordering release on a bond of Kshs. 300,000 or cash bail of Kshs. 100,000. The application for consolidation was otherwise dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with partial variation of bond terms
Orders
- The application for consolidation of bail terms is dismissed.
- Bond terms in Criminal Case No. 1969 of 2015 are varied to bond of Kshs. 300,000 or cash bail of Kshs. 100,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL DIVISION
CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 443 OF 2018
EMMANUEL OJUKI OTIENO...........APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC..........................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Applicant in this case prays for consolidation of his bail terms. He submitted his father who is since deceased had stood surety for him. He currently takes care of his ailing mother who developed blood pressure after the death of her husband. He argued that he has been in remand for one year and six months yet the cases were not proceeding.
2. Mr. Momanyi for the Respondent did not oppose the application upon submitting that all the cases were at Milimani Law Courts.
3. Before me are original record of five criminal cases in which the Applicant is charged (in some jointly with others) with various offences which are related. In Criminal Case No. 146/2018, bail terms were suspended because he had other criminal cases. It was argued by the prosecution that he had absconded but he advanced a defence that his father had died. He faces two counts of making a document without authority, two counts of uttering a false document and one count of attempt to obtain by false pretences. The proceedings do not show that any bail/bond was granted.
4. In Criminal Case No. 1969 of 2015, he faces twelve counts variously of conspiracy to defraud, making documents without authority, uttering false documents, procuring execution of a document by false pretence and personation. His father was a surety but passed on before the trial was concluded.
5. In Criminal Case No. 781 of 2016, he faces three counts of making a document without authority, three counts of uttering a false document, one count of personation and one count of attempt to obtain by false pretence. He was granted a bond of Kshs. 300,000/= or cash bail of Kshs. 100,000/=. He procured his release through deposit of a security. He was later arrested and charged in Criminal Case No. 118/2017 in which he was granted a cash bail of Kshs. 20,000/-. In case No. 781/2016, several warrants of arrest were issued after he absconded.
6. In Criminal Case No. 1449 of 2016 the Applicant faces one count of conspiracy to defraud, three counts of making a document without authority, three counts of uttering a false document, one count of personation and one count of attempt to obtain goods by false pretence. He was released on a bond of Kshs. 300,000/= or cash bail of Kshs.100,000/=.
7. I have considered the Applicant’s plea. Whereas an accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty, the Applicant’s case represents a person whose antecedents are of a likely offender. He did not learn from mistakes in the first case culminating into four files being opened against him. Most unfortunate is that all the charges are similar in all the files which raises an eye brow that the Applicant is not about to stop being a re-offender. It is for this reason I find it not prudent to consolidate the bond terms.
8. I have regard to the fact that the bond terms granted are very reasonable. I shall not vary them save in Criminal Case No. 1969 of 2015 where I order his release on a bond of Kshs. 300,000/= or a cash bail of Kshs. 100,000/=.
9. In sum, the application is dismissed with a variation of the bond terms in Criminal case No. 1969 of 2015. Once he is able to meet the various bond terms, the cases should be mentioned before the Chief Magistrate or any other magistrate he may allocate for confirmation of payment of the bonds/bails and order for his release.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi This 20th Day of May, 2019.
G.W.NGENYE-MACHARIA
JUDGE
In the presence of;
1. Applicant in person.
2. M/s Nyauncho for the Respondent.