[2017] KEHC 4370 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 4370 (KLR)

The court found that the requirement under Order 17 Rule 2(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules for written notice to be served on the parties prior to dismissal for want of prosecution was not satisfied, as the only notice given was by posting on the court notice board. There was no evidence that the plaintiff received...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 4370 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Emmy Jerobon Bett; Defendant: Rael Cherop Maritim; Defendant: V.K. Saina; Defendant: Post Bank Credit Limited (In Liquidation)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 138 of 2000
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Application for Review and Reinstatement After Dismissal
Outcome
Plaintiff's application for review and reinstatement allowed; dismissal order set aside; suit reinstated for hearing on priority basis.
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Review of Court Orders, Service of Notice, Reinstatement of Suit
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Review of Court Orders Service of Notice Reinstatement of Suit

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Emmy Jerobon Bett

Plaintiff

Rael Cherop Maritim

Defendant

V.K. Saina

Defendant

Post Bank Credit Limited (In Liquidation)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Application for Review and Reinstatement After Dismissal

  1. 1 Whether the dismissal of the plaintiff's suit for want of prosecution complied with the requirements of Order 17 Rule 2(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  2. 2 Whether notice of dismissal was properly served on the plaintiff as required by law.
  3. 3 Whether the suit should be reinstated in the interests of justice.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the requirement under Order 17 Rule 2(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules for written notice to be served on the parties prior to dismissal for want of prosecution was not satisfied, as the only notice given was by posting on the court notice board. There was no evidence that the plaintiff received or became aware of the notice. The court held that in the absence of proper service, the dismissal was irregular. In the interests of justice, and considering the age of the case and the lack of fault on the part of the plaintiff regarding notice, the court set aside the dismissal order and reinstated the suit for hearing on a priority basis.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's application for review and reinstatement allowed; dismissal order set aside; suit reinstated for hearing on priority basis.

Orders

  • The orders of 8th June, 2015 dismissing the plaintiff's suit are set aside.
  • The suit is reinstated for hearing on a priority basis.