[2018] KEELRC 1990 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent failed to defend the claim and did not attend court. The claimant established that there was a valid Collective Bargaining Agreement between the parties for the period in question. In the absence of any defence or contrary evidence, the court held that the respondent is obligated...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELRC 1990 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Kenya Engineering Workers’ Union; Respondent: Appar Tech Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 1982 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant.
- Judges
- MN Nduma
- Legal Topics
- Collective Bargaining Agreements, Implementation of Cba, Uncontested Claims
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Engineering Workers’ Union
Claimant
Appar Tech Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent should be compelled to implement the Collective Bargaining Agreement dated 2nd June 2013 for the period 1st August 2012 to 1st August 2014.
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to costs.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent failed to defend the claim and did not attend court. The claimant established that there was a valid Collective Bargaining Agreement between the parties for the period in question. In the absence of any defence or contrary evidence, the court held that the respondent is obligated to implement the terms of the CBA. The court therefore entered judgment in favour of the claimant and directed the respondent to implement the CBA within 30 days.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant.
Orders
- The respondent is directed to implement the Collective Bargaining Agreement between the minor Engineering Group of FKE and Kenya Engineering Workers’ Union dated 2nd June 2013 for the period 1st August 2012 to 1st August 2014 within 30 days of this judgment.
- The respondent to pay costs limited to disbursements (reimbursable).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 1982 OF 2014
(Before Hon. Justice Mathews Nderi Nduma)
KENYA ENGINEERING WORKERS’ UNION ..................... CLAIMANT
-Versus-
APPAR TECH LIMITED ....................................................... RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
The claimant seeks the court to direct the respondent to implement the Collective Bargaining Agreement between the minor Engineering Group of FKE and Kenya Engineering Workers’ Union dated 2nd June 0213 and for the period 1st August 2012 to 1st August 2014 (24 months).
The claim is not defended, the respondent having failed to attend court. Judgment is entered in favour of the claimant and the respondent is directed to implement the Collective Bargaining Agreement within 30 days of this judgment.
The respondent to pay costs limited to disbursements, (reimbursable).
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI ON THIS 16TH DAY OF APRIL 2018
MATHEWS NDERI NDUMA
JUDGE