[2020] KEHC 8424 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 8424 (KLR)

The High Court found that the trial magistrate erred by relying on an order (Kisii CMCC No. 156 of 2019, 8th May 2019) that had already been set aside by the High Court in Kisii HCCA No. 48 of 2019. However, the court also noted that the appellant's election was conducted in contempt of an existing order from the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 8424 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Rev. Enock Nyaanga; Respondent: Rev. Dr. James Ogendi; Respondent: Rev. Rose Nyauma; Respondent: Rev. Daniel Make; Respondent: Rev. Peter Karaya; Respondent: Rev. William Omaiyo; Respondent: Rev. Jackson Mireri; Respondent: Rev. Bathsheba Bitoyo; Respondent: Richard Gechiko
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 60 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay Pending Appeal
Outcome
application for stay dismissed; trial court's orders to remain in force pending further proceedings; each party to bear own costs
Judges
EM Muchoki
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunctions, Stay of Execution, Church Governance Disputes, Appeals Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Interlocutory Injunctions Stay of Execution Church Governance Disputes Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rev. Enock Nyaanga

Appellant

Rev. Dr. James Ogendi

Respondent

Rev. Rose Nyauma

Respondent

Rev. Daniel Make

Respondent

Rev. Peter Karaya

Respondent

Rev. William Omaiyo

Respondent

Rev. Jackson Mireri

Respondent

Rev. Bathsheba Bitoyo

Respondent

Richard Gechiko

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the trial magistrate erred in granting injunctive orders based on an order that had been set aside by a higher court.
  2. 2 Whether a stay of execution of the lower court's orders should be granted pending appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the appellant's election was valid in light of prior court orders affecting church elections.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court found that the trial magistrate erred by relying on an order (Kisii CMCC No. 156 of 2019, 8th May 2019) that had already been set aside by the High Court in Kisii HCCA No. 48 of 2019. However, the court also noted that the appellant's election was conducted in contempt of an existing order from the Kakamega High Court Constitutional Petition No. 6 of 2018, which had suspended church elections. In balancing these factors, the court determined that the interests of justice required the trial court's injunctive orders to remain in place pending the hearing and determination of the appeal, the suit in the lower court, or the final determination of the constitutional petition....

Court Disposition

application for stay dismissed; trial court's orders to remain in force pending further proceedings; each party to bear own costs

Orders

  • The application for stay is disallowed.
  • The orders issued by the trial court on 18th November 2019 shall remain in place pending the hearing and determination of the appeal, the suit in the lower court, or the final determination of Kakamega High Court Constitutional Petition No. 6 of 2018.