[2001] KEHC 360 (KLR)
The court found that the evidence against the appellant was overwhelming and that the trial magistrate was correct in accepting the prosecution's case and rejecting the defence. The appellate court was satisfied that the conviction for obtaining by false pretences was properly entered and that there was no basis to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] KEHC 360 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Enock Omoro Ogera; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 1098 of 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; conviction upheld; sentence served
- Legal Topics
- Obtaining by False Pretences, Criminal Appeal, Conviction Upheld
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Enock Omoro Ogera
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction for obtaining by false pretences was supported by the evidence.
- 2 Whether the trial magistrate properly evaluated the prosecution and defence evidence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the evidence against the appellant was overwhelming and that the trial magistrate was correct in accepting the prosecution's case and rejecting the defence. The appellate court was satisfied that the conviction for obtaining by false pretences was properly entered and that there was no basis to interfere with the findings of the trial court. The sentence had already been served, and thus the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; conviction upheld; sentence served
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The conviction is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
4 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL DIVISION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1098 OF 1999 (From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No.1384 of 1998 of the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Nairobi). ENOCK OMORO OGERA…………………………….APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…………………………………………….RESPONDENT J U D G M E N T
The appellant was convicted of obtaining by false pretences, contrary to section 313, P.C.
I have considered the evidence and the judgment. I am satisfied that the Magistrate rightly accepted the prosecution evidence and rejected the defence. The evidence against the appellant was overwhelming. I uphold the conviction. The sentence has been served.
The appeal is dismissed. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 28th May, 2001. V.V. PATEL JUDGE