[2018] KEELRC 939 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 939 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant had satisfied the requirements for the grant of an interim injunction as established in Giella v Cassman Brown Company Limited. The court emphasized that personal or private matters should not be used as grounds to interfere with the claimant's employment contract until the facts...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 939 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Rev. Dr. Enos Lwamba; Respondent: Rev. Patrick Lihanda; Respondent: Rev. Elisha Kimaiyo; Respondent: Rev. Patrick Oyondi; Respondent: Rev. Philip Owasi; Respondent: Rev. Paul Kohls; Respondent: Rev. Hellen Miminn; Respondent: Rev. Godfrey Ongwae; Respondent: Rev. Dominic Sinogo; Respondent: Rev. Everline Koech; Respondent: Prof. Lucas Shamala; Respondent: Mrs. Fridah Chahale
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Claim 180 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Injunction Application / Ruling on Interim Injunction and Counter Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Orders
Outcome
interim injunction granted; ex parte orders confirmed; respondents' application to set aside interim orders denied
Judges
MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Interim Injunctions, Disciplinary Proceedings, Employment Contracts
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Interim Injunctions Disciplinary Proceedings Employment Contracts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rev. Dr. Enos Lwamba

Applicant

Rev. Patrick Lihanda

Respondent

Rev. Elisha Kimaiyo

Respondent

Rev. Patrick Oyondi

Respondent

Rev. Philip Owasi

Respondent

Rev. Paul Kohls

Respondent

Rev. Hellen Miminn

Respondent

Rev. Godfrey Ongwae

Respondent

Rev. Dominic Sinogo

Respondent

Rev. Everline Koech

Respondent

Prof. Lucas Shamala

Respondent

Mrs. Fridah Chahale

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Injunction Application / Ruling on Interim Injunction and Counter Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Orders

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to an interim injunction restraining the respondents from suspending him pending the hearing of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether disciplinary proceedings based on personal/private matters should be injuncted until the main suit is heard and determined.
  3. 3 Whether the respondents' application to set aside ex parte interim orders should be granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant had satisfied the requirements for the grant of an interim injunction as established in Giella v Cassman Brown Company Limited. The court emphasized that personal or private matters should not be used as grounds to interfere with the claimant's employment contract until the facts are fully canvassed in the main suit. Accordingly, the court confirmed the ex parte interim orders previously granted, restraining the respondents and the Board of Governors from suspending the claimant or proceeding with disciplinary actions based on personal/private affairs until the main suit is heard and determined. The respondents' counter-application to set aside the...

Court Disposition

interim injunction granted; ex parte orders confirmed; respondents' application to set aside interim orders denied

Orders

  • The interim injunction restraining the respondents and the Board of Governors of Pentecostal Bible College from suspending the claimant in terms of the letter dated 13th April, 2018 is confirmed pending the hearing and determination of the main suit.
  • Any disciplinary proceedings underway based on personal/private affairs of the claimant are injuncted until all issues are heard and determined in the main suit.