[2019] KEHC 2575 (KLR)
The court found that there was no evidence before it to demonstrate that the applicant was served with notice of judgment. Accepting the applicant's explanation for the delay, and applying the principles governing extension of time, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application for leave to appeal out...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 2575 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: EPCO Builders Limited; Respondent: Michael Ondabu Omare
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Miscellaneous Application 272 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- application allowed with conditions
- Judges
- BT Jaden
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Discretion of Court, Service of Judgment Notice
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
EPCO Builders Limited
Applicant
Michael Ondabu Omare
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient cause for failure to file the appeal within the prescribed time.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to leave to appeal out of time under Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act.
- 3 Whether the respondent will suffer prejudice if the extension is granted.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there was no evidence before it to demonstrate that the applicant was served with notice of judgment. Accepting the applicant's explanation for the delay, and applying the principles governing extension of time, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application for leave to appeal out of time. The court imposed conditions for the grant, requiring the applicant to deposit the decretal sum in court or in a joint interest earning account within 30 days, and to pay the requisite court fees for the memorandum of appeal within 14 days. Costs were awarded to the respondent.
Court Disposition
application allowed with conditions
Orders
- The applicant is granted leave to appeal out of time.
- The memorandum and notice of appeal lodged are deemed duly filed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
CIVIL DIVISION
CIVIL MISC APPL. NO. 272 OF 2019
EPCO BUILDERS LIMITED.............................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
MICHAEL ONDABU OMARE....................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Application dated 22nd March, 2019 principally seeks orders that this honourable court be pleased to grant the Proposed Appellant leave to lodge an Appeal out of time against the decision Hon. D. W. Mburu in Civil Case No.5536 of 2015, delivered on 17th August, 2018.
2. Secondly, that upon grant of leave to appeal out of time, the Memorandum and Notice of Appeal lodged herein be deemed as duly filed.
3. The application is predicated on the grounds stated therein and the supporting affidavit sworn by counsel for the Applicant. The delay in filing the Appeal is blamed on delivery of the judgment in the absence of the Applicant and without notice. That execution is imminent and the Applicant is likely to suffer substantial loss as it may be impossible to recover the decretal sum. The Applicant is ready to furnish security of Ksh.200,000/= for the due performance of the decree.
4. In a replying affidavit filed in opposition to the application, it is stated that all the parties were served with a notice for the delivery of the judgment and that the application herein is an afterthought. That the appeal raises no triable issues and that the Applicant is undeserving of the exercise of this court’s discretion in it’s favour.
5. Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act provides that:
“Every appeal from a subordinate court to the High Court shall be filed within a period of 30 days from the date of the decree or order appealed against, excluding from such period any time which the lower court may certify as having been requisite for the preparation and delivery to the appellant of a copy of the decree or order. Provided that an appeal may be admitted out of time if the appellant satisfies the court that he had good and sufficient cause for not filing the appeal in time.”
(See also Section 59 of the Interpretation and General Provisions Act and Order 50 rule 6 Civil Procedure Rules and Section 3A Section 95 of Civil Procedure Act Cap 21 Laws of Kenya)
6. On enlargement of time, the principles applicable were set out by the Supreme Court of Kenya in the Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 7 others [2014] eKLR
as follows:
“This being the first case in which this court is called upon to consider the principles for extension of time, we derive the following as the under-lying principles that a court should consider in exercise of such discretion:
1. Extension of time is not a right of a party. It is an equitable remedy that is only available to a deserving party at the discretion of the court;
2. A party who seeks for extension of time has the burden of laying a basis to the satisfaction of the court;
3. Whether the court should exercise the discretion to extend time, is a consideration to be made on a case to case basis;
4. Whether there is a reasonable reason for the delay. The delay should be explained to the satisfaction of the court.
5. Whether there will be any prejudice suffered by the respondents if the extension is granted;
6. Whether the application has been brought without undue delay; and
7. Whether in certain cases, like election petitions, public interest should be consideration for extending time.”
7. In the case at hand, there is no document exhibited before this court to demonstrate whether the Applicant was served with the notice of judgment. This court therefore accepts the explanation given by the Applicant.
8. With the foregoing, I allow the application on condition that the Applicant do deposit the decretal sum in court or in a joint interest earning bank account of the counsels for the parties within 30 days from the date hereof. The requisite court fees for the filing of the Memorandum of appeal to be paid within 14 days from the date hereof. Cost to the Respondent.
Dated, signed and delivered at Nairobi this 24th day of Oct., 2019.
B THURANIRA JADEN
JUDGE