[2019] KEHC 2575 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 2575 (KLR)

The court found that there was no evidence before it to demonstrate that the applicant was served with notice of judgment. Accepting the applicant's explanation for the delay, and applying the principles governing extension of time, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application for leave to appeal out...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 2575 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: EPCO Builders Limited; Respondent: Michael Ondabu Omare
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Miscellaneous Application 272 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application allowed with conditions
Judges
BT Jaden
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Discretion of Court, Service of Judgment Notice
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Leave to Appeal Out of Time Discretion of Court Service of Judgment Notice

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

EPCO Builders Limited

Applicant

Michael Ondabu Omare

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient cause for failure to file the appeal within the prescribed time.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to leave to appeal out of time under Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent will suffer prejudice if the extension is granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was no evidence before it to demonstrate that the applicant was served with notice of judgment. Accepting the applicant's explanation for the delay, and applying the principles governing extension of time, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application for leave to appeal out of time. The court imposed conditions for the grant, requiring the applicant to deposit the decretal sum in court or in a joint interest earning account within 30 days, and to pay the requisite court fees for the memorandum of appeal within 14 days. Costs were awarded to the respondent.

Court Disposition

application allowed with conditions

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave to appeal out of time.
  • The memorandum and notice of appeal lodged are deemed duly filed.