[2024] KEHC 7936 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 7936 (KLR)

The court found that, although the appellant had not fully complied with all conditions for stay of execution, there was part compliance and payment for the lower court proceedings. In the interest of justice, and considering the appellant's efforts to obtain the proceedings, the court exercised its discretion to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 7936 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Equator Bottlers Ltd; Respondent: Eunice Rahel Achieng
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E033 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Ruling on Extension of Time
Outcome
Extension of time granted for filing the record of appeal and submissions; appellant directed to pay costs before next mention date.
Judges
MS Shariff
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Stay of Execution, Appeals Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Stay of Execution Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Equator Bottlers Ltd

Appellant

Eunice Rahel Achieng

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Ruling on Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the appellant should be granted an extension of time to file the record of appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant has complied with the conditions for stay of execution previously set by the court.
  3. 3 Whether the appellant has provided sufficient justification for the delay in filing the record of appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, although the appellant had not fully complied with all conditions for stay of execution, there was part compliance and payment for the lower court proceedings. In the interest of justice, and considering the appellant's efforts to obtain the proceedings, the court exercised its discretion to extend the timelines for filing the record of appeal by 21 days. The court also directed the appellant to file submissions within the same period and to pay the costs previously ordered before the next mention date. The extension was granted to avoid prejudicing the appellant's right of appeal, provided that the outstanding conditions are met.

Court Disposition

Extension of time granted for filing the record of appeal and submissions; appellant directed to pay costs before next mention date.

Orders

  • Appellant's timelines for filing the record of appeal are extended by 21 days.
  • Appellant to file the record of appeal and submissions within the extended period.