[2010] KEHC 1440 (KLR)
The court found that the Chief Magistrate's Court has a pecuniary jurisdiction of Ksh. 3 million, which is sufficient to try and dispose of the plaintiff's claim of Ksh. 2,197,171.93 plus interest. The court held that, in accordance with Section 11 of the Civil Procedure Act, the suit should have been filed before...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 1440 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Equity Bank Limited; Defendant: Irene Jacqueline Wasike
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 192 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Suit
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- FI Koome
- Legal Topics
- Pecuniary Jurisdiction, Transfer of Suit, Court Powers, Costs of Application
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Equity Bank Limited
Plaintiff
Irene Jacqueline Wasike
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Suit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court should transfer the suit to the Chief Magistrate's Court based on pecuniary jurisdiction.
- 2 Whether the Chief Magistrate's Court is competent to try and dispose of the matter given the claim amount and interest.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Chief Magistrate's Court has a pecuniary jurisdiction of Ksh. 3 million, which is sufficient to try and dispose of the plaintiff's claim of Ksh. 2,197,171.93 plus interest. The court held that, in accordance with Section 11 of the Civil Procedure Act, the suit should have been filed before the lowest competent court. Further, under Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act, the High Court has the power to transfer the suit to the appropriate subordinate court. The court therefore ordered the transfer of the suit to the Chief Magistrate's Court for trial and final disposal.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The suit is transferred to the Chief Magistrate's Court at Milimani Commercial Courts for trial and final disposal.
- The suit shall be mentioned on 30th June 2010 for directions as to hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
13 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS)
Civil Case 192 of 2010
EQUITY BANK LIMITED........................................................ PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT
VERSUS
IRENE JACQUELINE WASIKE....................................DEFENDANT/APPLICANT
RULING
1. The notice of motion dated 3rd June 2010 seeks for orders that this suit be transferred to the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Milimani Commercial Courts for trial and final disposal. This application is made by the defendant and it is predicated on the grounds that the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Chief Magistrate can adequately resolve the liquidated claim sought by the plaintiff. Secondly, a suit should be filed before the lowest grade to handle it. Moreover this suit will be handled more expeditiously by the Chief Magistrates Court at reduced costs.
2. This application was opposed by the plaintiff; reliance was placed on the replying affidavit by Purity Kinyanjui sworn on 9th June 2010. The plaintiff is of the view that the claim for Ksh.2. 197,171. 93 when the aspect of costs and interest is factored in, will be higher than the jurisdiction conferred upon the Chief Magistrate’s Court. She urged the court to dismiss the application.
3. The plaintiff’s claim is for a sum of Ksh.2. 197,171. 93 with interest at 24% per annum. Although interest is an exercise of the trial court’s discretion. Under the provisions of Section 11,this suit should have been filed before the Chief Magistrate Courts whose pecuniary jurisdiction is up to Kenya Shillings three (3) million. Under Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act this court has power to transfer the suit from this court to the subordinate court competent to try and dispose of the same. And the court can even do so suo motto.
4. The Chief Magistrate’s court pecuniary jurisdiction is Ksh.3 million therefore that court is competent to try and dispose this matter. I order it be transferred to the Chief Magistrate’s Court immediately and the suit be mentioned on 3oth June 2010 with a view of taking directions as to the hearing. Costs of this application shall be in the cause.
RULING READ AND SIGNED ON 25TH JUNE 2010 AT NAIROBI.
M.K. KOOME
JUDGE