[2009] KEHC 2130 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant pleaded guilty to the charge of manslaughter and was convicted on his own plea. The petition of appeal challenged only the sentence, not the conviction. The court held that unless the sentence is illegal or manifestly harsh and excessive, the appellate court will not interfere with...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 2130 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Erastus Chege Maina; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 73 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application denied
- Judges
- MSA Makhandia
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Manslaughter, Sentencing Discretion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Erastus Chege Maina
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be admitted to bail pending the hearing and determination of his appeal.
- 2 Whether the appeal has overwhelming chances of success to warrant bail pending appeal.
- 3 Whether there are exceptional or unusual circumstances justifying bail.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant pleaded guilty to the charge of manslaughter and was convicted on his own plea. The petition of appeal challenged only the sentence, not the conviction. The court held that unless the sentence is illegal or manifestly harsh and excessive, the appellate court will not interfere with the sentencing court's discretion. The applicant failed to demonstrate that his appeal had overwhelming chances of success or that there were exceptional or unusual circumstances justifying bail. Therefore, the application for bail pending appeal was denied.
Court Disposition
application denied
Orders
- The application for bail pending appeal is denied.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NYERI
CRIMINAL APPEAL 73 OF 2008
ERASTUS CHEGE MAINA ………………..…….. APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC ………………………………...…… RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
This is an application under section 357 of the Criminal Procedure Code. In the application, Erastus Chege Maina, hereinafter referred to as “the applicant” seeks that he be admitted to bail pending the hearing and final determination of his appeal.
Apparently, the applicant was on 18th March, 2008 arraigned before Miss L.W. Gitari (SPM) in the Chief Magistrate’s Court, Nyeri on one count of manslaughter contrary to section 202 and 205of the Penal Code. The particulars of the charge were that “On the 5th day of March, 2008 at Gikondi Secondary School, in Nyeri District within Central Province, unlawfully killed Daniel Kanyua Karenye….” The applicant pleaded guilty to the charge and a plea of guilty was entered. Thereafter facts were led by the prosecution. The applicant admitted the facts. Consequently he was convicted on his own plea of guilty. He was then allowed to mitigate whereupon he was sentenced to serve seven (7) years imprisonment.
Aggrieved by the sentence, the appellant lodged the instant appeal through Mr. M.K. Kiminda, Esq, Advocate which is limited to sentence only.
At the hearing of the application, Mr Kiminda submitted that though the applicant pleaded guilty to the charge and admitted the facts, there was a missing link between the act committed by the applicant and the cause of death of the deceased.
In response, Mr. Makura, learned state counsel submitted that the appeal had no overwhelming chances of success. The applicant pleaded guilty and facts led disclosed and supported the offence charged.
I have carefully considered the application, the supporting affidavit and rival oral submissions. In an application of this nature, the applicant must satisfy the court that the appeal as filed has overwhelming chances of success and also minor consideration as to whether there were exceptional and unusual circumstances. See Dominic Karanja V Republic (1986) KLR 612. In this case the applicant pleaded guilty to the charge. That plea was properly and carefully taken by the learned magistrate. The facts in my view and contrary to the submissions by Kiminda disclosed a charge of manslaughter. I was also surprised by the about turn made by Mr. Kiminda. His petition of appeal filed raises only two grounds of appeal and they are all sentence. The conviction is not challenged at. By making the submission that there was a missing link between the act committed by the applicant and the cause of death, Mr. Kiminda, was indirectly questioning the conviction. However, he has not amended his petition to capture that fact. In the circumstances I do not think that it will be right for me to consider issues that are not captured in the petition of appeal.
Sentence it has always been said, is a discretion exercised by the sentencing court. Unless the sentence imposed is illegal or manifestly harsh and excessive the appellate court will hardly interfere with exercise of such discretion. One cannot therefore say with fortitude that an appeal based solely on sentence which is not illegal as in this case has overwhelming chances of succeeding. I do not think that the applicant has demonstrated to my satisfaction that his appeal has overwhelming chances of success. Accordingly the application is denied.
Dated and delivered at Nyeri this 9th day of July, 2009.
M.S.A. MAKHANDIA
JUDGE