[2021] KEELRC 2180 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 2180 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent had not fully complied with the conditional stay orders issued on 29th July 2019, as interest and monthly allowances had not been paid as required. However, the principal sum had been deposited in accordance with the court's directive. The court noted that the parties could not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 2180 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Erastus K. Gitonga; Claimant: Edwrad K. Wabwoto; Claimant: Cicilia W. Githaiga; Claimant: Judith N. Kithinji; Claimant: Simon Ngara; Respondent: The National Environment Management Authority; Interested Party: Law Society of Kenya; Interested Party: The Attorney-General
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 547 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
conditional stay of execution granted
Judges
J Rika
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Appeal Procedure, Interest on Judgment Debt, Allowances, Compliance With Court Orders
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Stay of Execution Appeal Procedure Interest on Judgment Debt Allowances Compliance With Court Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Erastus K. Gitonga

Claimant

Edwrad K. Wabwoto

Claimant

Cicilia W. Githaiga

Claimant

Judith N. Kithinji

Claimant

Simon Ngara

Claimant

The National Environment Management Authority

Respondent

Law Society of Kenya

Interested Party

The Attorney-General

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the respondent complied with the conditional stay orders regarding deposit of decretal sum, interest, and allowances.
  2. 2 Whether interest and monthly allowances are payable as per the judgment and whether they are subject to negotiation.
  3. 3 Whether the application for stay of execution pending appeal should be allowed given the respondent's partial compliance.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent had not fully complied with the conditional stay orders issued on 29th July 2019, as interest and monthly allowances had not been paid as required. However, the principal sum had been deposited in accordance with the court's directive. The court noted that the parties could not agree on the amount of interest and allowances, estimating the outstanding sum at no less than Kshs. 3,000,000. Recognizing that the appeal raised weighty legal issues and that the involvement of the Attorney-General and Law Society of Kenya indicated the significance of the dispute, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application for stay of execution on the...

Court Disposition

conditional stay of execution granted

Orders

  • The application dated 24th May 2019 is allowed on condition that the respondent tops up the deposit held by the advocates by Kshs. 3,000,000 within 14 days.
  • In default, the conditional stay order shall become void.