[2021] KEELRC 2180 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent had not fully complied with the conditional stay orders issued on 29th July 2019, as interest and monthly allowances had not been paid as required. However, the principal sum had been deposited in accordance with the court's directive. The court noted that the parties could not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEELRC 2180 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Erastus K. Gitonga; Claimant: Edwrad K. Wabwoto; Claimant: Cicilia W. Githaiga; Claimant: Judith N. Kithinji; Claimant: Simon Ngara; Respondent: The National Environment Management Authority; Interested Party: Law Society of Kenya; Interested Party: The Attorney-General
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 547 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- conditional stay of execution granted
- Judges
- J Rika
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Appeal Procedure, Interest on Judgment Debt, Allowances, Compliance With Court Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Erastus K. Gitonga
Claimant
Edwrad K. Wabwoto
Claimant
Cicilia W. Githaiga
Claimant
Judith N. Kithinji
Claimant
Simon Ngara
Claimant
The National Environment Management Authority
Respondent
Law Society of Kenya
Interested Party
The Attorney-General
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent complied with the conditional stay orders regarding deposit of decretal sum, interest, and allowances.
- 2 Whether interest and monthly allowances are payable as per the judgment and whether they are subject to negotiation.
- 3 Whether the application for stay of execution pending appeal should be allowed given the respondent's partial compliance.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent had not fully complied with the conditional stay orders issued on 29th July 2019, as interest and monthly allowances had not been paid as required. However, the principal sum had been deposited in accordance with the court's directive. The court noted that the parties could not agree on the amount of interest and allowances, estimating the outstanding sum at no less than Kshs. 3,000,000. Recognizing that the appeal raised weighty legal issues and that the involvement of the Attorney-General and Law Society of Kenya indicated the significance of the dispute, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application for stay of execution on the...
Court Disposition
conditional stay of execution granted
Orders
- The application dated 24th May 2019 is allowed on condition that the respondent tops up the deposit held by the advocates by Kshs. 3,000,000 within 14 days.
- In default, the conditional stay order shall become void.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR
RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NUMBER 547 OF 2018
BETWEEN
1. ERASTUS K. GITONGA
2. EDWRAD K. WABWOTO
3. CICILIA W. GITHAIGA
4. JUDITH N. KITHINJI
5. SIMON NGARA..............................................................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT
AUTHORITY...................................................................RESPONDENT
AND
1. LAW SOCIETY OF KENYA
2 THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL............................INTERESTED PARTIES
RULING
1. The Claimants obtained Judgment against the Respondent on 10th April 2019. Judgment comprises principal amount of Kshs. 13,300,000. It includes also, orders that the Respondent pays monthly non-practice and prosecutorial allowances to the Claimants, and interest.
2. The Respondent filed an Appeal against the decision, at the Court of Appeal. The Respondent also sought an order for stay of execution pending Appeal. The Application seeking this order, is dated 29th May 2019.
3. On 29th July 2019, the Court ordered inter alia, that the Respondent is granted conditional order of stay of execution pending hearing and determination of the Application inter partes. The condition was that the Respondent would deposit the decretal sum, plus all the payments accruing under the orders in the Judgment, on monthly basis, in an interest earning account in the joint names of the Applicants and the Claimants, or Claimants’ and Respondent’s Advocates and report be made to the Court on 30th August 2019.
4. Parties agree that the Respondent has deposited the principal sum of Kshs. 13,300,000 as ordered.
5. There is dispute on interest and monthly allowances payable. The Respondent proposed to pay, through a letter dated 4th February 2020 a total of Kshs. 1,826,000, comprising accrued interest, non-practice allowance and prosecutorial allowance. Its position is that Parties were in negotiation over the accrued interest.
6. The Claimants submit that the Respondent declined to deposit interest accrued from the date of Judgment, 10th April 2020, amounting to Kshs. 1,127,000 as of 16th October 2019. The Respondent also failed to pay monthly allowances as ordered. The Claimants submit that interest is fixed by law, and is not subject to negotiation. Lastly, the Claimants submit that the Record of Appeal filed by the Respondent at the Court of Appeal, was only filed in September 2020, 7 months after the Judgment, in violation of the 60-day limitation set by the law. Typed and certified proceedings of the Trial Court were ready, by 27th February 2020.
The Court Finds: -
7. The Respondent has not complied in full, with the orders given by Hon. Judge Byram Ongaya, on 29th July 2019. Interest has not been paid. Allowances have not been paid monthly as ordered. The Respondent has however, deposited the principal amount of Kshs. 13,300,000 in an interest earning bank account, held in the name of the Claimants’ and the Respondent’s Advocates.
8. The Parties have not been able to agree on the interest and allowances payable. The Court estimates as of today, the amount in question is no less than Kshs. 3,000,000. The Respondent has already lodged its Record of Appeal. Whether the Appeal was validly filed, is an issue best left for the Court of Appeal to determine.
9. The Court is satisfied that the Appeal raises weighty matters of the law. The fact that the Attorney-General and the Law Society of Kenya, were added to the trial proceedings, suggests there is considerable weight in the matters in dispute. It is important that those matters are distilled through our appellate system.
IT IS ORDERED: -
a. The Application dated 24th May 2019 is allowed on the condition that the Respondent tops up deposit held by the Advocates for the respective parties, by an amount of Kshs. 3,000,000 within the next 14 days.
b. In default the order [a] made today shall become void.
c. No order on the costs.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi, this 11th day of February 2021.
James Rika
JUDGE