[2025] KECPT 267 (KLR)
The Tribunal found that, as the matter had been withdrawn and there was no response from the claimant, the Bill of Costs should be assessed on the lower scale as per the Advocate Remuneration Order. Instruction fees were taxed at Kshs 50,000, attendances at Kshs 3,000, and disbursements at Kshs 825, totaling Kshs...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KECPT 267 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mike Munyasya Erastus; Respondent: The Board of Directors of Suluhu Savings and Credit Cooperative Limited
- Court
- Cooperative Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case 20/E029 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Bill of Costs / Ruling on Taxation of Costs
- Outcome
- Bill of Costs assessed and allowed as prayed.
- Judges
- BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Advocate Remuneration, Withdrawal of Suit
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mike Munyasya Erastus
Applicant
The Board of Directors of Suluhu Savings and Credit Cooperative Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bill of Costs / Ruling on Taxation of Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Bill of Costs as presented by the respondent should be allowed and at what quantum.
- 2 Whether the applicable scale under the Advocate Remuneration Order is the lower scale due to withdrawal of the matter.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that, as the matter had been withdrawn and there was no response from the claimant, the Bill of Costs should be assessed on the lower scale as per the Advocate Remuneration Order. Instruction fees were taxed at Kshs 50,000, attendances at Kshs 3,000, and disbursements at Kshs 825, totaling Kshs 51,125. The Tribunal applied the relevant legal framework for taxation of costs in withdrawn matters and allowed the respondent's Bill of Costs as prayed.
Court Disposition
Bill of Costs assessed and allowed as prayed.
Orders
- The Bill of Costs is assessed at Kshs 51,125.
- The respondent is awarded costs as taxed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
Erastus v Board of Directors of Suluhu Savings and Credit Cooperative Limited (Tribunal Case 20/E029 of 2023) [2025] KECPT 267 (KLR) (29 April 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KECPT 267 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Cooperative Tribunal
Tribunal Case 20/E029 of 2023
BM Kimemia, Chair, Janet Mwatsama, Vice Chair, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki & M Chesikaw, Members
April 29, 2025
Between
Mike Munyasya Erastus
Claimant
and
The Board of Directors of Suluhu Savings and Credit Cooperative Limited
Respondent
Ruling
1. The matter for determination is a Bill of Cost dated 5. 8.2024.
2. There was no response from the Claimant to date.
3. The same is assessed as per the schedule II Advocate Remuneration Order as follows:1. Instructions fees, the matter having been withdrawn taxed at Kshs 50,000/= being the lower scale.2. Attendances items 2,3,4,5,6 and 7 taxed at Kshs 500/= each total Kshs 3000/=.3. Disbursements allowed as prayed total taxed at Kshs 825/=
4. We therefore assess the Bill of cost at Kshs 51,125/=
RULING SIGNED, DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI THIS 29TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025. HON. B. KIMEMIA CHAIRPERSON SIGNED 29. 4.2025HON. J. MWATSAMA DEPUTY CHAIRPERSON SIGNED 29. 4.2025HON. BEATRICE SAWE MEMBER SIGNED 29. 4.2025HON. FRIDAH LOTUIYA MEMBER SIGNED 29. 4.2025HON. PHILIP GICHUKI MEMBER SIGNED 29. 4.2025HON. MICHAEL CHESIKAW MEMBER SIGNED 29. 4.2025Tribunal Clerk JemimahMs. Mbaadi for ClaimantNo appearance for RespondentHON. B. KIMEMIA CHAIRPERSON SIGNED 29. 4.2025