[2015] KEHC 5875 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 5875 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had established ownership of the premises and had issued a valid notice to the defendant to vacate. The defendant failed to vacate and continued to occupy the premises without consent, constituting trespass. The plaintiff's claim for loss of use at Kshs. 4,000 per month was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 5875 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Eric Langat; Defendant: Paul Bii
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 15 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiff
Judges
MA Silau
Legal Topics
Vacant Possession, Trespass to Land, Damages for Trespass, Landlord Tenant Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Vacant Possession Trespass to Land Damages for Trespass Landlord Tenant Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eric Langat

Plaintiff

Paul Bii

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to vacant possession of the premises.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to damages for use and occupation or trespass.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had established ownership of the premises and had issued a valid notice to the defendant to vacate. The defendant failed to vacate and continued to occupy the premises without consent, constituting trespass. The plaintiff's claim for loss of use at Kshs. 4,000 per month was disallowed due to lack of proof. However, the court awarded general damages for trespass in the sum of Kshs. 50,000, recognizing the violation of the plaintiff's proprietary rights. The court also granted vacant possession and costs to the plaintiff, as the defendant's continued occupation was uncontroverted and unjustified.

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • The defendant is ordered to forthwith give vacant possession to the plaintiff; if the defendant has already left, the plaintiff may take full possession.
  • The claim for loss of use of Kshs. 4,000 per month is disallowed.