[2016] KEHC 7694 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 7694 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had not satisfied the requirements for the grant of interim injunctive relief. Specifically, the applicant failed to demonstrate a prima facie case with a probability of success or that he would suffer irreparable harm that could not be compensated by an award of damages. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 7694 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Eric Mong’are Ogaro; Respondent: Catholic University of Eastern Africa (CUEA); Respondent: Regina Pacis University College
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 115 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
I Lenaola
Legal Topics
Right to Education, Interim Injunctions, University Graduation, Fair Administrative Action
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Right to Education Interim Injunctions University Graduation Fair Administrative Action

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eric Mong’are Ogaro

Applicant

Catholic University of Eastern Africa (CUEA)

Respondent

Regina Pacis University College

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the petitioner is entitled to interim injunctive relief restraining the respondents from excluding his name from the graduation list pending determination of the petition.
  2. 2 Whether the application meets the threshold for grant of interim injunctions in constitutional petitions.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had not satisfied the requirements for the grant of interim injunctive relief. Specifically, the applicant failed to demonstrate a prima facie case with a probability of success or that he would suffer irreparable harm that could not be compensated by an award of damages. The court exercised its discretion under Article 159 of the Constitution and the relevant procedural rules to dismiss the application, holding that the interests of justice did not warrant the grant of the orders sought at the interlocutory stage. Costs were ordered to abide the outcome of the main petition.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 29th March 2016 is dismissed.
  • Costs shall abide the Petition.