[2019] KEELRC 1509 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 1509 (KLR)

The court found that the present application for stay of execution was a repetition of an earlier application that had already been determined and dismissed. Entertaining the same application again would amount to an abuse of the court process. Consequently, the court declined to consider the merits of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 1509 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Eric Muthama Nduu; Respondent: Jayveer Enterprises Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1957 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
DI Wasike
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Abuse of Process, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Stay of Execution Abuse of Process Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eric Muthama Nduu

Claimant

Jayveer Enterprises Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the application for stay of execution pending appeal meets the requirements under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the present application constitutes an abuse of the court process.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the present application for stay of execution was a repetition of an earlier application that had already been determined and dismissed. Entertaining the same application again would amount to an abuse of the court process. Consequently, the court declined to consider the merits of the application and dismissed it with costs to the claimant.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application dated 4th February, 2019 is dismissed with costs.